Propose a change

The Armed Forces (Appeals Against Review of Sentence) Regulations 2024

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

22 Procedural directions: powers of single judge and registrar

(1) The power of the Appeal Court to determine an application for procedural directions may be exercised by— (a) a judge of the Appeal Court, or (b) the registrar. (2) In this regulation, “procedural directions” means directions for the efficient and effective preparation of— (a) an application for leave to appeal, or (b) an appeal under section 304D or 304E of the 2006 Act. (3) A judge of the Appeal Court may give such procedural directions as the judge thinks fit— (a) when acting under paragraph (1); (b) on a reference from the registrar; (c) on the judge’s own motion. (4) The registrar may give such procedural directions as the registrar thinks fit— (a) when acting under paragraph (1); (b) on the registrar’s own motion.

Your change, as a redline

22 Procedural directions: powers of single judge and registrar

(1) The power of the Appeal Court to determine an application for procedural directions may be exercised by— (a) a judge of the Appeal Court, or (b) the registrar. (2) In this regulation, “procedural directions” means directions for the efficient and effective preparation of— (a) an application for leave to appeal, or (b) an appeal under section 304D or 304E of the 2006 Act. (3) A judge of the Appeal Court may give such procedural directions as the judge thinks fit— (a) when acting under paragraph (1); (b) on a reference from the registrar; (c) on the judge’s own motion. (4) The registrar may give such procedural directions as the registrar thinks fit— (a) when acting under paragraph (1); (b) on the registrar’s own motion.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds