United Kingdom · regulation
Ask the law about thisMore laws of United KingdomFor machines: Markdown
In force since 2025-07-11, as the publisher states.
Copy read on 2026-11-10. The page it was read from
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives.
sha256 3ca21802a545d18f352532b7f5cc17bd246ca8c4d2c17c792f366a3832e68eaa
No one has proposed a change to this act yet.
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
2025 No. 703 REVENUE AND CUSTOMS, ENGLAND AND WALES The Revenue and Customs (Complaints and Misconduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 Made 17th June 2025 Laid before Parliament 19th June 2025 Coming into force 11th July 2025 The Treasury make the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 28(1), (2) and (6) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005.
Propose a change(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Revenue and Customs (Complaints and Misconduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2025. (2) These Regulations come into force on 11th July 2025. (3) Where a complaint was made, or a conduct matter, recordable conduct matter or DSI matter came to the attention of the appropriate authority, before 11th July 2025, these Regulations— (a) apply in respect of a re-investigation of that complaint or matter under regulation 70A of the Revenue and Customs (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2010 (as inserted by regulation 55 of these Regulations), and (b) do not otherwise apply. (4) In paragraph (3)— “appropriate authority” has the same meaning as in regulation 3 of the Revenue and Customs (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2010 not taking into account the amendments made by regulation 3(a); “complaint”, “conduct matter”, “DSI matter” and “recordable conduct matter” have the same meanings as in regulation 3 of the Revenue and Customs (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2010.
Propose a changeThe Revenue and Customs (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2010 are amended in accordance with regulations 3 to 60.
Propose a changeIn regulation 3 (interpretation)— (a) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the definition of “appropriate authority” for paragraphs (a) and (b) substitute— (a) in relation to the Commissioners or an officer or in relation to any complaint, matter or investigation relating to the conduct of such a person, means— (i) if that person is a Permanent Secretary, the Head of the Home Civil Service, (ii) if that person is a Commissioner (other than a Permanent Secretary), a Permanent Secretary, or (iii) if that person is an officer, the Commissioners (other than a Permanent Secretary), and (b) in relation to a death or serious injury matter and the relevant officer, means the Commissioners (other than a Permanent Secretary); ; (ii) omit the definitions of “the Chairman”, “the Chief Executive” and “the Permanent Secretary for Tax”; (iii) in the definition of “the Commissioners” for “the Chairman” substitute “a Permanent Secretary”; (iv) after the definition of “officer” insert— “a Permanent Secretary” means a Permanent Secretary of HMRC; ; (b) in paragraph (8)— (i) for “under the supervision of the Director General, under the management of the Director General” substitute “under the direction of the Director General”; (ii) omit sub-paragraph (b); (iii) in sub-paragraph (c) for “management or under the supervision” substitute “direction”; (iv) in sub-paragraph (d) for “managed” substitute “directed”.
Propose a changeIn regulation 5 (application of the 2002 Act)— (a) in paragraph (2) omit sub-paragraph (e); (b) in paragraph (3)— (i) in sub-paragraph (a) for “subsection (2)(k)” substitute “subsection (2)(a) and (k)”; (ii) after sub-paragraph (a) insert— (aa) in subsection (2)(n), after “kept by” insert “the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs,”; ; (iii) after sub-paragraph (b) insert— ; (c) omit subsection (2)(pa). ; (c) in paragraph (4), in sub-paragraph (b) after “(b)” insert “, (ba), (bb)”.
Propose a changeIn regulation 8 (reports to the Chancellor of the Exchequer) for paragraph (2) substitute— (2) The Chancellor may also require reports to be made (at any time)— (a) by the Director General about the carrying out of the Director General's functions, (b) by the IOPC about the carrying out of the IOPC’s functions, or (c) jointly by the Director General and the IOPC about the carrying out of their functions. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 9 (complaints, matters and persons to which these Regulations apply)— (a) in paragraph (2) omit “, and regulation 19(3)”; (b) after paragraph (8) insert— (8A) In paragraph (8), “the person in question” means the person making the complaint or the person on whose behalf the complaint is being made. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 12 (co-operation, assistance and information)— (a) in paragraph (4) after “under these Regulations” insert “or any review under regulation 74”; (b) omit paragraph (5); (c) in paragraph (6) omit “45,”.
Propose a changeAfter regulation 14 (use of information) insert— Restriction on disclosure of sensitive information 14A (1) Where the Director General receives information within paragraph (3), the Director General must not disclose (whether under regulation 8, 54 or 55 or otherwise) the information, or the fact that it has been received, unless the relevant authority consents to the disclosure. (2) Where a person appointed under regulation 46 or 47 to investigate a complaint or matter (an “investigator”) receives information within paragraph (3), that investigator must not disclose the information, or the fact that it has been received, to any person other than the Director General unless the relevant authority consents to the disclosure. (3) The information is— (a) intelligence service information; (b) protected information relating to a relevant warrant; (c) information obtained from a government department which, at the time it is provided to the Director General or an investigator, is identified by the department as information the disclosure of which may, in the opinion of the relevant authority— (i) cause damage to national security, international relations or the economic interests of the United Kingdom or any part of the United Kingdom, or (ii) jeopardise the safety of any person. (4) Where the Director General or an investigator discloses to another person information within paragraph (3), or the fact that the Director General or the investigator has received it, the other person must not disclose that information or that fact unless the relevant authority consents to the disclosure. (5) A person who provides information that is intelligence service information or protected information relating to a relevant warrant to the Director General or an investigator (whether under a provision of these Regulations or otherwise) must— (a) make the Director General or investigator aware that the information is intelligence service information or (as the case may be) protected information relating to a relevant warrant, and (b) provide the Director General or investigator with such additional information as will enable the Director General or the investigator to identify the relevant authority in relation to the information. (6) In this regulation— “government department” means a department of His Majesty's Government but does not include— the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service, or the Government Communications Headquarters (“GCHQ”); “intelligence service information” means information that was obtained (directly or indirectly) from or that relates to— the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service, GCHQ, or any part of His Majesty's forces, or of the Ministry of Defence, which engages in intelligence activities; “investigator” has the meaning given by paragraph (2); “Minister of the Crown” includes the Treasury; “protected information”, in relation to a relevant warrant, means information relating to any of the matters mentioned in section 57(4) of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 in relation to the warrant; “relevant authority” means— in the case of intelligence service information obtained (directly or indirectly) from or relating to the Security Service, the Director-General of the Security Service; in the case of intelligence service information obtained (directly or indirectly) from or relating to the Secret Intelligence Service, the Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service; in the case of intelligence service information obtained (directly or indirectly) from or relating to GCHQ, the Director of GCHQ; in the case of intelligence service information obtained (directly or indirectly) from or relating to His Majesty's forces or the Ministry of Defence, the Secretary of State; in the case of protected information relating to a relevant warrant, the person to whom the relevant warrant is or was addressed; in the case of information within paragraph (3)(c)— the Secretary of State, or the Minister of the Crown in charge of the government department from which the information was obtained (if that Minister is not a Secretary of State); “relevant warrant” means— a warrant under Chapter 1 of Part 2 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, or a warrant under Chapter 1 of Part 6 of that Act. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 18 (delegation of powers and duties), in paragraph (2) for “the Chief Executive”, in both places it occurs, substitute “a Permanent Secretary”.
Propose a changeIn regulation 19 (initial handling and recording of complaints)— (a) for paragraph (1) substitute— (1) Where a complaint is made to the Director General, the Director General must give notification of the complaint to the appropriate authority. (1A) But the Director General is not required to give that notification if the Director General considers that there are exceptional circumstances that justify its not being given. ; (b) omit paragraph (3); (c) in paragraph (4) omit “or the Director General brings any matter to the appropriate authority’s attention under paragraph (3)”; (d) after paragraph (5) insert— (5A) Where an appropriate authority records a complaint under paragraph (5), the appropriate authority must notify the complainant of the recording of the complaint. ; (e) in paragraph (6) omit sub-paragraph (a) and the “or” after it.
Propose a changeIn regulation 20 (keeping of records), at the end of paragraph (b) insert “or regulation 24(1) (recording etc. of conduct matters in other cases)”.
Propose a changeOmit regulation 21 (failures to notify or record a complaint).
Propose a changeIn regulation 22 (handling of complaints by the appropriate authority), in paragraph (2)— (a) after “in whatever” insert “reasonable and proportionate”; (b) for “or take” substitute “which may include taking”.
Propose a changeIn regulation 24 (recording etc. of conduct matters in other cases)— (a) in paragraph (3), in sub-paragraph (c) after “serious corruption,” insert “including abuse of position for a sexual purpose or the purpose of pursuing an improper emotional relationship,”; (b) omit paragraph (6).
Propose a changeIn regulation 26 (complaints against a person who has subsequently ceased to serve with HMRC) after “appropriate authority”, in both places it occurs, insert “or the Director General”.
Propose a changeIn regulation 28 (reference of complaints to the Director General)— (a) in paragraph (1)— (i) for “the complaint is” substitute “the complaint relates to the conduct of a Commissioner or an officer who, at the time of the conduct complained of, was acting in connection with the execution of their duties and is”; (ii) in sub-paragraph (b)— (aa) for “alleging conduct which” substitute “which relates to the performance of a specified enforcement activity and which alleges that the conduct complained of”; (bb) in paragraph (iii) after “serious corruption,” insert “including abuse of position for a sexual purpose or the purpose of pursuing an improper emotional relationship,”; (iii) for sub-paragraph (d) substitute— (d) one in respect of which— (i) conduct falling within sub-paragraph (a) or (b) is alleged, and (ii) the Director General notifies the appropriate authority that the Director General requires the complaint in question to be referred to the Director General for the Director General’s consideration. ; (b) in paragraph (3)— (i) for “on the Chief Executive” substitute “on a Permanent Secretary”; (ii) for “the Chairman, the Chief Executive and the Permanent Secretary for Tax” substitute “a Permanent Secretary”; (iii) for “the Chief Executive is”, in both places it occurs, substitute “the Permanent Secretary is”; (c) in paragraph (4)— (i) omit “that authority considers that it would be appropriate to do so by reason of”; (ii) for sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) substitute— (a) it is a complaint which alleges conduct that— (i) falls within paragraph (1)(a), or (ii) relates to the performance of a specified enforcement activity, and (b) that authority considers that it would be appropriate to do so by reason of— (i) the gravity of the subject-matter of the complaint, or (ii) any exceptional circumstances. ; (d) in paragraph (5)— (i) in sub-paragraph (a) for “the Chief Executive” substitute “a Permanent Secretary”; (ii) omit the “and” after sub-paragraph (a); (iii) after that sub-paragraph insert— (aa) it is a complaint which alleges conduct that— (i) falls within paragraph (1)(a), or (ii) relates to the performance of a specified enforcement activity; and ; (e) in paragraph (10) after “previous occasion” insert “, or that has been treated as having been so referred by virtue of regulation 28A”; (f) after paragraph (10) insert— (11) In this regulation— “specified enforcement activity” means an activity— carried out for the purpose of, or in connection with, a criminal investigation, or in all other cases, which is, or is connected with, the exercise of— a power of entry; a power to search premises, persons or property; a power of detention; a power of seizure; a power to examine or inspect premises, persons or property; a power to compel the provision of information, or to require the production of documents for inspection, from any person exercised in the presence of that person; and includes an activity carried out in connection with any authorisation granted under Part 2 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000; “criminal investigation” has the meaning given in section 21(2A) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005. .
Propose a changeAfter regulation 28 insert— Power of the Director General to treat complaint as having been referred 28A (1) The Director General may treat a complaint as having been referred if it is a complaint that— (a) is required or permitted to be referred to the Director General under regulation 28, and (b) comes to the Director General’s attention other than having been so referred. (2) Where the Director General treats a complaint as having been referred— (a) regulations 19 and 28 do not apply, or cease to apply, in relation to the complaint except to the extent provided for by regulation 28(10), and (b) regulations 22, 29, 38 and 74 apply in relation to the complaint as if it had been referred to the Director General by the appropriate authority under regulation 28. (3) The Director General must notify the following that the Director General is treating a complaint as having been referred to the Director General— (a) the appropriate authority, (b) the complainant, and (c) except in a case where it appears to the Director General that to do so might prejudice an investigation of the complaint (whether an existing investigation or a possible future one), the person complained against (if any). (4) Where an appropriate authority receives a notification under paragraph (3) in respect of a complaint and the complaint has not been recorded, the appropriate authority must record the complaint. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 29 (duties of the Director General on references under regulation 28)— (a) in paragraph (3)— (i) after “in whatever” insert “reasonable and proportionate”; (ii) for “or take” substitute “which may include taking”; (b) in paragraph (4), for sub-paragraph (b) substitute— (b) except in a case where it appears to the Director General that to do so might prejudice an investigation of the complaint (whether an existing investigation or a possible future one), to the person complained against (if any). .
Propose a changeIn regulation 30 (reference of conduct matters to the Director General)— (a) in paragraph (1)— (i) after “recordable conduct matter” insert “, which concerns the conduct of a Commissioner or an officer acting in connection with the execution of their duties,”; (ii) for paragraph (c) substitute— (c) it is a matter in respect of which— (i) conduct falling within sub-paragraph (a) or (b) is alleged, and (ii) the Director General notifies the appropriate authority that the Director General requires that matter to be referred to the Director General for the Director General’s consideration. ; (b) in paragraph (2)— (i) for “relates to conduct falling” substitute “concerns conduct relating to the performance of a specified enforcement activity and which falls”; (ii) in sub-paragraph (c) after “serious corruption,” insert “including abuse of position for a sexual purpose or the purpose of pursuing an improper emotional relationship,”; (c) in paragraph (5)— (i) omit “that authority considers that it would be appropriate to do so by reason of”; (ii) for sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) substitute— (a) the conduct matter— (i) falls within paragraph (1)(a), or (ii) relates to the performance of a specified enforcement activity, and (b) that authority considers that it would be appropriate to do so by reason of— (i) the gravity of the matter, or (ii) any exceptional circumstances. ; (d) in paragraph (6)— (i) in sub-paragraph (a) for “the Chief Executive” substitute “a Permanent Secretary”; (ii) omit the “and” after sub-paragraph (a); (iii) after that sub-paragraph insert— (aa) the conduct matter— (i) falls within paragraph (1)(a), or (ii) relates to the performance of a specified enforcement activity, and ; (e) in paragraph (10) after “previous occasion” insert “, or that has been treated as having been so referred by virtue of regulation 30A”; (f) after paragraph (10) insert— (11) In this regulation, “specified enforcement activity” has the meaning given in regulation 28(11). .
Propose a changeAfter regulation 30 insert— Power of the Director General to treat conduct matters as having been referred 30A (1) The Director General may treat a conduct matter as having been referred if it is a matter that— (a) is required or permitted to be referred to the Director General under regulation 30, and (b) comes to the Director General’s attention other than having been so referred. (2) Where the Director General treats a conduct matter as having been referred— (a) regulations 23, 24 and 30 do not apply, or cease to apply, in relation to that matter except to the extent provided for by regulation 30(10), and (b) regulations 31 and 38 apply in relation to that matter as if it had been referred to the Director General by the appropriate authority under regulation 30. (3) The Director General must notify the following that the Director General is treating a conduct matter as having been referred to the Director General— (a) the appropriate authority, and (b) except in a case where it appears to the Director General that to do so might prejudice an investigation of the matter (whether an existing investigation or a possible future one), the person to whose conduct the matter relates. (4) Where an appropriate authority receives a notification under paragraph (3) in respect of a conduct matter and the matter has not been recorded, the appropriate authority must record the matter. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 31 (duties of the Director General on references under regulation 30), in paragraph (3), in sub-paragraph (b) for “a possible future investigation of that matter” substitute “an investigation of that matter (whether an existing investigation or a possible future one)”.
Propose a changeIn regulation 32 (duty to record DSI matters) omit paragraph (2).
Propose a changeAfter regulation 34 (reference of DSI matters to the Director General) insert— Power of the Director General to treat DSI matters as having been referred 34A (1) The Director General may treat a DSI matter that comes to the Director General’s attention otherwise than by having been referred to the Director General under regulation 34 as having been so referred. (2) Where the Director General treats a DSI matter as having been referred— (a) regulations 32 and 34 do not apply, or cease to apply, in relation to that matter except to the extent provided for by regulation 34(3), and (b) regulations 35 and 38 apply in relation to that matter as if it had been referred to the Director General by the appropriate authority under regulation 34. (3) The Director General must notify the appropriate authority that the Director General is treating a DSI matter as having been referred to the Director General. (4) Where an appropriate authority receives a notification under paragraph (3) in respect of a DSI matter and the matter has not been recorded, the appropriate authority must record the matter. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 36 (procedure where conduct matter is revealed during investigation of DSI matter)— (a) in paragraph (1) for the words from “designated under regulation 47” to “under regulation 46” substitute “appointed under regulation 46 or 47”; (b) after paragraph (2) insert— (2ZA) If during the course of an investigation of a DSI matter being carried out by a person appointed under regulation 46 or 47 the Director General determines (without there having been a submission under paragraph (1)) that there is an indication that the person whose conduct is in question may have— (a) committed a criminal offence, or (b) behaved in a manner which would justify the bringing of disciplinary proceedings, the Director General must notify the appropriate authority in relation to the DSI matter and (if different) the appropriate authority in relation to the person whose conduct is in question of the Director General's determination. ; (c) in paragraph (2A) after “determines that” insert “there is an indication that”; (d) in paragraph (3) omit the words from “or 45 or” to “under regulation 46,”; (e) in paragraph (5)— (i) in sub-paragraph (a) after “(2)” insert “, (2ZA)”; (ii) in the words after sub-paragraph (c), omit the words from “(and the other provisions” to the end.
Propose a changeIn regulation 37 (inspections of HMRC premises on behalf of the Director General), in paragraph (2)— (a) in sub-paragraph (b) for “supervision or management.” substitute “direction;”; (b) after sub-paragraph (b) insert— (c) the purposes of any review by the Director General under regulation 75. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 38 (power of the Director General to determine the form of an investigation)— (a) in paragraph (4)— (i) omit sub-paragraphs (b) and (c); (ii) in sub-paragraphs (d) and (e), for “management” substitute “direction”; (b) after paragraph (4) insert— (4A) In making a determination under paragraph (2), the Director General must first determine whether having regard to the seriousness of the case and the public interest, it is appropriate for the investigation to take the form of an investigation by the appropriate authority on its own behalf and if it is the Director General must determine that the investigation is to take that form. (4B) Where in accordance with paragraph (4A), the Director General determines that it is not appropriate for the investigation to take the form of an investigation by the appropriate authority on its own behalf, the Director General must determine that the investigation is to take the form of an investigation by the Director General, unless paragraph (4C) or (4D) applies. (4C) This paragraph applies where the Director General determines that it would be more appropriate for the investigation to take the form of an investigation by the appropriate authority under the direction of the Director General, in which case the Director General must determine that the investigation is to take that form. (4D) This paragraph applies where the Director General determines that it would be more appropriate for the investigation to take the form of an investigation by a police force under the direction of the Director General, in which case the Director General must determine that the investigation is to take that form. (4E) Where the Director General determines under paragraph (4C), (4D) or (4G) that an investigation is to take the form of an investigation under the direction of the Director General, the Director General must keep under review whether that form of investigation continues to be the most appropriate form of investigation. (4F) If, on such a review, the Director General determines that— (a) it would be more appropriate for the investigation to take the form of an investigation by the Director General, the Director General must make a further determination under this paragraph (to replace the earlier one) that the investigation is instead to take that form; (b) having regard to the seriousness of the case and the public interest, it would be more appropriate for the investigation to take the form of an investigation by the appropriate authority on its own behalf, the Director General may make a further determination under this paragraph (to replace the earlier one) that the investigation is instead to take that form. (4G) Subject to paragraph (4F), if at any time the Director General determines that, were the Director General to apply paragraphs (4A) to (4D) again, the form of the investigation would be different, the Director General may make a further determination under this paragraph (to replace the earlier one) such that the investigation takes that different form. ; (c) in paragraph (5) omit “(4)(c),”; (d) omit paragraph (6); (e) in paragraph (9) after “DSI matter” insert “and of the Director General’s reasons for making that determination”; (f) after paragraph (9) insert— (10) The Director General must also notify the following of any determination that the Director General makes under this regulation in relation to a particular complaint, recordable conduct matter or DSI matter and of the Director General’s reasons for making the determination— (a) every person entitled to be kept properly informed in relation to the complaint, conduct matter or DSI matter under regulation 55; (b) where the determination is made in relation to a complaint, the complainant; (c) the person in respect of whose conduct the investigation will relate (if any), unless it appears to the Director General that to do so might prejudice an investigation (whether an existing investigation or a possible future one). (11) Regulation 60 has effect in relation to the duties imposed on the Director General by paragraph (10) of this regulation. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 39 (appointment of persons to carry out investigations) omit “45,”.
Propose a changeAfter regulation 39 insert— Timeliness of investigations 39A (1) Where an investigation under regulation 44 (investigations by the appropriate authority on its own behalf) is not completed within a relevant period, the appropriate authority must, as soon as practicable after the end of that relevant period, provide in writing the information mentioned in paragraph (4) to the Director General. (2) Where an investigation under regulation 46, 47 or 48 (investigation by a police force under the direction of the Director General, investigations directed by the Director General and investigations by the Director General) is not completed within a relevant period, the Director General must, as soon as practicable after the end of that relevant period, provide in writing the information mentioned in paragraph (4) to the appropriate authority. (3) For the purposes of this regulation, each of the following is a “relevant period”— (a) the period of 12 months beginning with the date on which— (i) the complaint to which the investigation relates was made, or (ii) the conduct matter or DSI matter to which the investigation relates came to the attention of the appropriate authority; (b) each subsequent period of six months beginning with the day after the day on which the previous relevant period ended. (4) The information that must be provided is— (a) the date on which— (i) the complaint to which the investigation relates was made, or (ii) the conduct matter or DSI matter to which the investigation relates came to the attention of the appropriate authority, (b) the date on which any notice was given under regulation 56(1), (c) the progress of the investigation, (d) an estimate of when the report on the investigation will be submitted or, in the case of an investigation by the Director General personally, completed under regulation 66 or 69 (final reports on investigations), (e) the reason for the length of time being taken to complete the investigation, and (f) a summary of planned steps to progress the investigation and bring it to a conclusion. (5) The appropriate authority or Director General (as the case may be) must send a copy of the information provided under paragraph (1) or (2) to— (a) every person entitled to be kept properly informed in relation to the complaint, conduct matter or DSI matter under regulation 55, (b) the complainant (if any), and (c) except in a case where it appears to the appropriate authority or Director General (as the case may be) that to do so might prejudice the investigation (including a criminal investigation), the person whose conduct the investigation relates. (6) Regulation 60 has effect in relation to the duties imposed on the Director General or appropriate authority (as the case may be) by paragraph (5) of this regulation. .
Propose a changeOmit regulation 40 (power of the Director General to impose requirements in relation to an investigation which the Director General is supervising).
Propose a changeIn regulation 41 (combining and splitting investigations)— (a) in paragraph (2) for “supervising, managing” substitute “directing”; (b) in paragraph (3) for “supervised or managed” substitute “directed”.
Propose a changeOmit regulation 42 (power of the Director General to discontinue an investigation).
Propose a changeIn regulation 43 (withdrawn and discontinued complaints)— (a) in paragraph (3) for sub-paragraph (b) substitute— (b) which the appropriate authority knows is currently the subject of an application for a review by the Director General under regulation 74 (review by the Director General with respect to an investigation); or ; (b) in paragraph (8), in sub-paragraph (b) for “an appeal to” substitute “a review by”; (c) in paragraph (10), in sub-paragraph (b) for “within 21 days from the date of the communication under sub-paragraph (a)” substitute “to a communication under sub-paragraph (a) within a period of 28 days beginning with the day after the day on which the communication was sent”.
Propose a changeIn regulation 44 (investigations by the appropriate authority on its own behalf), in paragraph (3) for “the Chairman, the Chief Executive or the Permanent Secretary for Tax” substitute “a Permanent Secretary”.
Propose a changeOmit regulation 45 (investigations supervised by the Director General).
Propose a changeIn regulation 46 (investigation by a police force under the management or under the supervision of the Director General)— (a) in the heading for “management or under the supervision” substitute “direction”; (b) in paragraph (1) for “management or supervision” substitute “direction”; (c) in paragraph (5)— (i) for “(3) to (6) of regulation 45 (investigations supervised by the Director General)” substitute “(2A) to (2D) of regulation 47 (investigations directed by the Director General)”; (ii) for “supervise” substitute “direct”; (d) in paragraph (7) for “an investigation under the management of the Director General” substitute “that investigation”; (e) after paragraph (8) insert— (9) The person appointed to investigate the complaint or matter must keep the Director General informed of the progress of the investigation. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 47 (investigations managed by the Director General)— (a) in the heading for “managed” substitute “directed”; (b) in paragraph (1) for “manage” substitute “direct”; (c) for paragraph (2) substitute— (2) On being given notice of that determination, the appropriate authority must, if it has not already done so, appoint a person to investigate the complaint or matter. (2A) The Director General may require that no appointment is made under paragraph (2) unless the Director General has given notice to the appropriate authority that the Director General approves the person whom that authority proposes to appoint. (2B) Where at any time the Director General is not satisfied with the person appointed to investigate, the Director General may require the appropriate authority, as soon as reasonably practicable after being required to do so— (a) to select another person to investigate the complaint or matter, and (b) to notify the Director General of the person selected. (2C) Paragraph (2B) applies whether the person investigating was appointed— (a) before the appropriate authority was notified of the Director General’s determination that the Director General should direct the investigation by the appropriate authority, (b) under paragraph (2) (including where the appointment was approved by the Director General in accordance with paragraph (2A)), or (c) under paragraph (2D)(a). (2D) Where a selection made in pursuance of a direction under paragraph (2B) has been notified to the Director General— (a) the appropriate authority must appoint that person to investigate the complaint or matter if, but only if, the Director General notifies the authority that the Director General approves the appointment of that person, or (b) if the Director General notifies the appropriate authority that the Director General does not approve the appointment of that person, the appropriate authority must make another selection in accordance with paragraph (2B). ; (d) after paragraph (3) insert— (4) The person appointed to investigate the complaint or matter must keep the Director General informed of the progress of the investigation. (5) The person appointed to investigate the complaint or matter must comply with all such requirements in relation to the carrying out of that investigation as may be imposed by these Regulations. .
Propose a changeAfter regulation 48 insert— Investigations by the Director General: power to serve information notice 48A (1) The Director General may serve upon any person an information notice requiring the person to provide the Director General with information that the Director General reasonably requires for the purposes of an investigation in accordance with regulation 48. (2) But an information notice must not require a person— (a) to provide information that might incriminate the person; (b) to provide an item subject to legal privilege within the meaning of section 10 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984; (c) to make a disclosure that would be prohibited by any of Parts 1 to 7 or Chapter 1 of Part 9 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016; (d) to provide information that was provided to the person by, or by an agency of, the government of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom where that government does not consent to the disclosure of the information. (3) An information notice must— (a) specify or describe the information that is required by the Director General and the form in which it must be provided; (b) specify the period within which the information must be provided; (c) give details of the right of appeal against the information notice under regulation 48C. (4) The period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not end before the end of the period within which an appeal can be brought against the notice and, if such an appeal is brought, the information need not be provided pending the determination or withdrawal of the appeal. (5) The Director General may cancel an information notice by written notice to the person on whom it was served. Failure to comply with information notice 48B (1) If a person who has received an information notice— (a) fails or refuses to provide the information required by the notice, or (b) knowingly or recklessly provides information in response to the notice that is false in a material respect, the Director General may certify in writing to the High Court that the person has failed to comply with the information notice. (2) The High Court may then inquire into the matter and, after hearing any witness who may be produced against or on behalf of the person, and after hearing any statement offered in defence, deal with the person as if the person had committed a contempt of court. Appeals against information notices 48C (1) A person on whom an information notice is served may appeal against the notice to the First-tier Tribunal on the ground that the notice is not in accordance with the law. (2) If the Tribunal considers that the notice is not in accordance with the law— (a) it must quash the notice, and (b) it may give directions to the Director General in relation to the service of a further information notice. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 49 (relinquishing the Director General’s supervision or management of an investigation)— (a) in the heading for “supervision or management” substitute “direction”; (b) for paragraph (1) substitute— (1) This regulation applies where the Director General relinquishes the direction of an investigation in favour of an investigation by the appropriate authority on its own behalf. .
Propose a changeIn regulation 50 (circumstances in which an investigation or other procedure may be suspended)— (a) in paragraph (2) for “management” substitute “direction”; (b) in paragraph (6) omit “under the supervision of the Director General or”.
Propose a change