(1) A prosecutor who wishes to make an application under section 76(1) or (2) must give notice of the application to the Court of Appeal.
(2) Within two days beginning with the day on which any such notice is given, notice of the application must be served by the prosecutor on the person to whom the application relates, charging him with the offence to which it relates or, if he has been charged with it in accordance with section 87(4), stating that he has been so charged.
(3) Subsection (2) applies whether the person to whom the application relates is in the United Kingdom or elsewhere, but the Court of Appeal may, on application by the prosecutor, extend the time for service under that subsection if it considers it necessary to do so because of that person’s absence from the United Kingdom.
(4) The Court of Appeal must consider the application at a hearing.
(5) The person to whom the application relates—
(a) is entitled to be present at the hearing, although he may be in custody, unless he is in custody elsewhere than in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, and
(b) is entitled to be represented at the hearing, whether he is present or not.
(6) For the purposes of the application, the Court of Appeal may, if it thinks it necessary or expedient in the interests of justice—
(a) order the production of any document, exhibit or other thing, the production of which appears to the court to be necessary for the determination of the application, and
(b) order any witness who would be a compellable witness in proceedings pursuant to an order or declaration made on the application to attend for examination and be examined before the court.
(7) The Court of Appeal may at one hearing consider more than one application (whether or not relating to the same person), but only if the offences concerned could be tried on the same indictment.
(1) The Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (c. 19) is amended as follows.
(2) In section 33 (right of appeal to Supreme Court), after subsection (1A) there is inserted—
(1B) An appeal lies to the Supreme Court , at the instance of the acquitted person or the prosecutor, from any decision of the Court of Appeal on an application under section 76(1) or (2) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (retrial for serious offences).
(3) At the end of that section there is inserted—
(4) In relation to an appeal under subsection (1B), references in this Part to a defendant are references to the acquitted person.
(4) In section 34(2) (extension of time for leave to appeal), after “defendant” there is inserted “ or, in the case of an appeal under section 33(1B), by the prosecutor ”.
(5) In section 38 (presence of defendant at hearing), for “has been convicted of an offence and” substitute “ has been convicted of an offence, or in whose case an order under section 77 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 or a declaration under section 77(4) of that Act has been made, and who ”.
82 Restrictions on publication in the interests of justice
(1) Where it appears to the Court of Appeal that the inclusion of any matter in a publication would give rise to a substantial risk of prejudice to the administration of justice in a retrial, the court may order that the matter is not to be included in any publication while the order has effect.
(2) In subsection (1) “retrial” means the trial of an acquitted person for a qualifying offence pursuant to any order made or that may be made under section 77.
(3) The court may make an order under this section only if it appears to it necessary in the interests of justice to do so.
(4) An order under this section may apply to a matter which has been included in a publication published before the order takes effect, but such an order—
(a) applies only to the later inclusion of the matter in a publication (whether directly or by inclusion of the earlier publication), and
(b) does not otherwise affect the earlier publication.
(5) After notice of an application has been given under section 80(1) relating to the acquitted person and the qualifying offence, the court may make an order under this section only—
(a) of its own motion, or
(b) on the application of the Director of Public Prosecutions.
(6) Before such notice has been given, an order under this section—
(a) may be made only on the application of the Director of Public Prosecutions, and
(b) may not be made unless, since the acquittal concerned, an investigation of the commission by the acquitted person of the qualifying offence has been commenced by officers.
(7) The court may at any time, of its own motion or on an application made by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the acquitted person, vary or revoke an order under this section.
(8) Any order made under this section before notice of an application has been given under section 80(1) relating to the acquitted person and the qualifying offence must specify the time when it ceases to have effect.
(9) An order under this section which is made or has effect after such notice has been given ceases to have effect, unless it specifies an earlier time—
(a) when there is no longer any step that could be taken which would lead to the acquitted person being tried pursuant to an order made on the application, or
(b) if he is tried pursuant to such an order, at the conclusion of the trial.
(10) Nothing in this section affects any prohibition or restriction by virtue of any other enactment on the inclusion of any matter in a publication or any power, under an enactment or otherwise, to impose such a prohibition or restriction.
(11) In this section—
“programme service” has the same meaning as in the Broadcasting Act 1990 (c. 42),
“publication” includes any speech, writing, relevant programme or other communication in whatever form, which is addressed to the public at large or any section of the public (and for this purpose every relevant programme is to be taken to be so addressed), but does not include an indictment or other document prepared for use in particular legal proceedings,
“relevant programme” means a programme included in a programme service.
83 Offences in connection with publication restrictions
(1) This section applies if—
(a) an order under section 82 is made, whether in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, and
(b) while the order has effect, any matter is included in a publication, in any part of the United Kingdom, in contravention of the order.
(2) Where the publication is a newspaper or periodical, any proprietor, editor or publisher of the newspaper or periodical is guilty of an offence.
(3) Where the publication is a relevant programme—
(a) any body corporate or Scottish partnership engaged in providing the programme service in which the programme is included, and
(b) any person having functions in relation to the programme corresponding to those of an editor of a newspaper,
is guilty of an offence.
(4) In the case of any other publication, any person publishing it is guilty of an offence.
(5) If an offence under this section committed by a body corporate is proved—
(a) to have been committed with the consent or connivance of, or
(b) to be attributable to any neglect on the part of,
an officer, the officer as well as the body corporate is guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
(6) In subsection (5), “officer” means a director, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body, or a person purporting to act in any such capacity.
(7) If the affairs of a body corporate are managed by its members, “director” in subsection (6) means a member of that body.
(8) Where an offence under this section is committed by a Scottish partnership and is proved to have been committed with the consent or connivance of a partner, he as well as the partnership shall be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
(9) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.
(10) Proceedings for an offence under this section may not be instituted—
(a) in England and Wales otherwise than by or with the consent of the Attorney General, or
(b) in Northern Ireland otherwise than by or with the consent of—
(i) before the relevant date, the Attorney General for Northern Ireland, or
(ii) on or after the relevant date, the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland.
(11) In subsection (10) “the relevant date” means the date on which section 22(1) of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 (c. 26) comes into force.
(1) Where a person—
(a) is tried pursuant to an order under section 77(1), or
(b) is tried on indictment pursuant to an order under section 77(3),
the trial must be on an indictment preferred by direction of the Court of Appeal.
(2) After the end of 2 months after the date of the order, the person may not be arraigned on an indictment preferred in pursuance of such a direction unless the Court of Appeal gives leave.
(3) The Court of Appeal must not give leave unless satisfied that—
(a) the prosecutor has acted with due expedition, and
(b) there is a good and sufficient cause for trial despite the lapse of time since the order under section 77.
(4) Where the person may not be arraigned without leave, he may apply to the Court of Appeal to set aside the order and—
(a) for any direction required for restoring an earlier judgment and verdict of acquittal of the qualifying offence, or
(b) in the case of a person acquitted elsewhere than in the United Kingdom, for a declaration to the effect that the acquittal is a bar to his being tried for the qualifying offence.
(5) An indictment under subsection (1) may relate to more than one offence, or more than one person, and may relate to an offence which, or a person who, is not the subject of an order or declaration under section 77.
(6) Evidence given at a trial pursuant to an order under section 77(1) or (3) must be given orally if it was given orally at the original trial, unless—
(a) all the parties to the trial agree otherwise,
(b) section 116 applies, or
(c) the witness is unavailable to give evidence, otherwise than as mentioned in subsection (2) of that section, and section 114(1)(d) applies.
(7) At a trial pursuant to an order under section 77(1), paragraph 5 of Schedule 3 to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (c. 37) (use of depositions) does not apply to a deposition read as evidence at the original trial.
(1) This section applies to the investigation of the commission of a qualifying offence by a person—
(a) acquitted in proceedings within section 75(1) of the qualifying offence, or
(b) acquitted elsewhere than in the United Kingdom of an offence the commission of which as alleged would have amounted to or included the commission (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) of the qualifying offence.
(2) Subject to section 86, an officer may not do anything within subsection (3) for the purposes of such an investigation unless the Director of Public Prosecutions—
(a) has certified that in his opinion the acquittal would not be a bar to the trial of the acquitted person in England and Wales for the qualifying offence, or
(b) has given his written consent to the investigation (whether before or after the start of the investigation).
(3) The officer may not, either with or without the consent of the acquitted person—
(a) arrest or question him,
(b) search him or premises owned or occupied by him,
(c) search a vehicle owned by him or anything in or on such a vehicle,
(d) seize anything in his possession, or
(e) take his fingerprints or take a sample from him.
(4) The Director of Public Prosecutions may only give his consent on a written application, and such an application may be made only by an officer who—
(a) if he is an officer of the metropolitan police force or the City of London police force, is of the rank of commander or above, or
(b) in any other case, is of the rank of assistant chief constable or above.
(5) An officer may make an application under subsection (4) only if—
(a) he is satisfied that new evidence has been obtained which would be relevant to an application under section 76(1) or (2) in respect of the qualifying offence to which the investigation relates, or
(b) he has reasonable grounds for believing that such new evidence is likely to be obtained as a result of the investigation.
(6) The Director of Public Prosecutions may not give his consent unless satisfied that—
(a) there is, or there is likely as a result of the investigation to be, sufficient new evidence to warrant the conduct of the investigation, and
(b) it is in the public interest for the investigation to proceed.
(7) In giving his consent, the Director of Public Prosecutions may recommend that the investigation be conducted otherwise than by officers of a specified police force or specified team of customs and excise officers.
(1) Section 85 does not prevent an officer from taking any action for the purposes of an investigation if—
(a) the action is necessary as a matter of urgency to prevent the investigation being substantially and irrevocably prejudiced,
(b) the requirements of subsection (2) are met, and
(c) either—
(i) the action is authorised under subsection (3), or
(ii) the requirements of subsection (5) are met.
(2) The requirements of this subsection are met if—
(a) there has been no undue delay in applying for consent under section 85(2),
(b) that consent has not been refused, and
(c) taking into account the urgency of the situation, it is not reasonably practicable to obtain that consent before taking the action.
(3) An officer of the rank of superintendent or above may authorise the action if—
(a) he is satisfied that new evidence has been obtained which would be relevant to an application under section 76(1) or (2) in respect of the qualifying offence to which the investigation relates, or
(b) he has reasonable grounds for believing that such new evidence is likely to be obtained as a result of the investigation.
(4) An authorisation under subsection (3) must—
(a) if reasonably practicable, be given in writing;
(b) otherwise, be recorded in writing by the officer giving it as soon as is reasonably practicable.
(5) The requirements of this subsection are met if—
(a) there has been no undue delay in applying for authorisation under subsection (3),
(b) that authorisation has not been refused, and
(c) taking into account the urgency of the situation, it is not reasonably practicable to obtain that authorisation before taking the action.
(6) Where the requirements of subsection (5) are met, the action is nevertheless to be treated as having been unlawful unless, as soon as reasonably practicable after the action is taken, an officer of the rank of superintendent or above certifies in writing that he is satisfied that, when the action was taken—
(a) new evidence had been obtained which would be relevant to an application under section 76(1) or (2) in respect of the qualifying offence to which the investigation relates, or
(b) the officer who took the action had reasonable grounds for believing that such new evidence was likely to be obtained as a result of the investigation.
86A Application of sections 85 and 86 to investigations by the Police Ombudsman
(1) Sections 85 and 86 apply in relation to an investigation by an officer of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland with the following modifications.
(2) References in sections 85(2) and (3) and 86(1) to an officer shall be read as references to an officer of the Ombudsman.
(3) Section 85(4) has effect as if for the words from “an officer who” to the end there were substituted the Ombudsman.
(4) Section 85(5) has effect as if for “An officer” there were substituted The Ombudsman.
(4) Section 85(7) does not apply.
(6) Section 86(3) has effect as if for “An officer of the rank of superintendent or above” there were substituted A senior officer of the Ombudsman.
(7) Section 86(6) has effect as if for “an officer of the rank of superintendent or above” there were substituted a senior officer of the Ombudsman.
(8) References to a senior officer of the Ombudsman are to an officer of the rank of senior investigating officer or above.
(1) Where section 85 applies to the investigation of the commission of an offence by any person and no certification has been given under subsection (2) of that section—
(a) a justice of the peace may issue a warrant to arrest that person for that offence only if satisfied by written information that new evidence has been obtained which would be relevant to an application under section 76(1) or (2) in respect of the commission by that person of that offence, and
(b) that person may not be arrested for that offence except under a warrant so issued.
(2) Subsection (1) does not affect section 89(3)(b) or 91(3), or any other power to arrest a person, or to issue a warrant for the arrest of a person, otherwise than for an offence.
(3) Part 4 of the 1984 Act (detention) applies as follows where a person—
(a) is arrested for an offence under a warrant issued in accordance with subsection (1)(a), or
(b) having been so arrested, is subsequently treated under section 34(7) of that Act as arrested for that offence.
(4) For the purposes of that Part there is sufficient evidence to charge the person with the offence for which he has been arrested if, and only if, an officer of the rank of superintendent or above (who has not been directly involved in the investigation) is of the opinion that the evidence available or known to him is sufficient for the case to be referred to a prosecutor to consider whether consent should be sought for an application in respect of that person under section 76.
(5) For the purposes of that Part it is the duty of the custody officer at each police station where the person is detained to make available or known to an officer at that police station of the rank of superintendent or above any evidence which it appears to him may be relevant to an application under section 76(1) or (2) in respect of the offence for which the person has been arrested, and to do so as soon as practicable—
(a) after the evidence becomes available or known to him, or
(b) if later, after he forms that view.
(6) Section 37 of that Act (including any provision of that section as applied by section 40(8) of that Act) has effect subject to the following modifications—
(a) in subsection (1)—
(i) for “determine whether he has before him” there is substituted “ request an officer of the rank of superintendent or above (who has not been directly involved in the investigation) to determine, in accordance with section 87(4) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, whether there is ”;
(ii) for “him to do so” there is substituted “ that determination to be made ”;
(b) in subsection (2)—
(i) for the words from “custody officer determines” to “before him” there is substituted “ officer determines that there is not such sufficient evidence ”;
(ii) the word “custody” is omitted from the second place where it occurs;
(c) in subsection (3)—
(i) the word “custody” is omitted;
(ii) after “may” there is inserted “ direct the custody officer to ”;
(d) in subsection (7) for the words from “the custody officer” to the end of that subsection there is substituted “ an officer of the rank of superintendent or above (who has not been directly involved in the investigation) determines, in accordance with section 87(4) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, that there is sufficient evidence to charge the person arrested with the offence for which he was arrested, the person arrested shall be charged. ”;
(e) subsections (7A), (7B) and (8) do not apply;
(f) after subsection (10) there is inserted—
(10A) The officer who is requested by the custody officer to make a determination under subsection (1) above shall make that determination as soon as practicable after the request is made.
.
(7) Section 40 of that Act has effect as if in subsections (8) and (9) of that section after “(6)” there were inserted “ and (10A) ”.
(8) Section 42 of that Act has effect as if in subsection (1) of that section for the words from “who” to “detained” there were substituted “ (who has not been directly involved in the investigation) ”.
(1) In relation to a person charged in accordance with section 87(4)—
(a) section 38 of the 1984 Act (including any provision of that section as applied by section 40(10) of that Act) has effect as if, in subsection (1), for “either on bail or without bail” there were substituted “ on bail ”,
(b) section 47(3) of that Act does not apply and references in section 38 of that Act to bail are references to bail subject to a duty to appear before the Crown Court at such place as the custody officer may appoint and at such time, not later than 24 hours after the person is released, as that officer may appoint, and
(c) section 43B of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 (c. 43) does not apply.
(2) Where such a person is, after being charged—
(a) kept in police detention, or
(b) detained by a local authority in pursuance of arrangements made under section 38(6) of the 1984 Act,
he must be brought before the Crown Court as soon as practicable and, in any event, not more than 24 hours after he is charged, and section 46 of the 1984 Act does not apply.
(3) For the purpose of calculating the period referred to in subsection (1) or (2), the following are to be disregarded—
(za) Saturday,
(a) Sunday,
(b) Christmas Day,
(c) Good Friday, and
(d) any day which is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 (c. 80) in the part of the United Kingdom where the person is to appear before the Crown Court as mentioned in subsection (1) or, where subsection (2) applies, is for the time being detained.
(4) Where a person appears or is brought before the Crown Court in accordance with subsection (1) or (2), the Crown Court may either—
(a) grant bail for the person to appear, if notice of an application is served on him under section 80(2), before the Court of Appeal at the hearing of that application, or
(b) remand the person in custody to be brought before the Crown Court under section 89(2).
(5) If the Crown Court grants bail under subsection (4), it may revoke bail and remand the person in custody as referred to in subsection (4)(b).
(6) In subsection (7) the “relevant period”, in relation to a person granted bail or remanded in custody under subsection (4), means—
(a) the period of 42 days beginning with the day on which he is granted bail or remanded in custody under that subsection, or
(b) that period as extended or further extended under subsection (8).
(7) If at the end of the relevant period no notice of an application under section 76(1) or (2) in relation to the person has been given under section 80(1), the person—
(a) if on bail subject to a duty to appear as mentioned in subsection (4)(a), ceases to be subject to that duty and to any conditions of that bail, and
(b) if in custody on remand under subsection (4)(b) or (5), must be released immediately without bail.
(8) The Crown Court may, on the application of a prosecutor, extend or further extend the period mentioned in subsection (6)(a) until a specified date, but only if satisfied that—
(a) the need for the extension is due to some good and sufficient cause, and
(b) the prosecutor has acted with all due diligence and expedition.
(1) This section applies where notice of an application is given under section 80(1).
(2) If the person to whom the application relates is in custody under section 88(4)(b) or (5), he must be brought before the Crown Court as soon as practicable and, in any event, within 48 hours after the notice is given.
(3) If that person is not in custody under section 88(4)(b) or (5), the Crown Court may, on application by the prosecutor—
(a) issue a summons requiring the person to appear before the Court of Appeal at the hearing of the application, or
(b) issue a warrant for the person’s arrest,
and a warrant under paragraph (b) may be issued at any time even though a summons has previously been issued.
(4) Where a summons is issued under subsection (3)(a), the time and place at which the person must appear may be specified either—
(a) in the summons, or
(b) in a subsequent direction of the Crown Court.
(5) The time or place specified may be varied from time to time by a direction of the Crown Court.
(6) A person arrested under a warrant under subsection (3)(b) must be brought before the Crown Court as soon as practicable and in any event within 48 hours after his arrest, and section 81(5) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 (c. 54) does not apply.
(7) If a person is brought before the Crown Court under subsection (2) or (6) the court must either—
(a) remand him in custody to be brought before the Court of Appeal at the hearing of the application, or
(b) grant bail for him to appear before the Court of Appeal at the hearing.
(8) If bail is granted under subsection (7)(b), the Crown Court may revoke the bail and remand the person in custody as referred to in subsection (7)(a).
(9) For the purpose of calculating the period referred to in subsection (2) or (6), the following are to be disregarded—
(za) Saturday,
(a) Sunday,
(b) Christmas Day,
(c) Good Friday, and
(d) any day which is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 (c. 80) in the part of the United Kingdom where the person is for the time being detained.
(1) The Court of Appeal may, at any adjournment of the hearing of an application under section 76(1) or (2)—
(a) remand the person to whom the application relates on bail, or
(b) remand him in custody.
(2) At a hearing at which the Court of Appeal—
(a) makes an order under section 77,
(b) makes a declaration under subsection (4) of that section, or
(c) dismisses the application or makes a declaration under subsection (3) of that section, if it also gives the prosecutor leave to appeal against its decision or the prosecutor gives notice that he intends to apply for such leave,
the court may make such order as it sees fit for the custody or bail of the acquitted person pending trial pursuant to the order or declaration, or pending determination of the appeal.
(3) For the purpose of subsection (2), the determination of an appeal is pending—
(a) until any application for leave to appeal is disposed of, or the time within which it must be made expires;
(b) if leave to appeal is granted, until the appeal is disposed of.
(4) Section 4 of the Bail Act 1976 (c. 63) applies in relation to the grant of bail under this section as if in subsection (2) the reference to the Crown Court included a reference to the Court of Appeal.
(5) The court may at any time, as it sees fit—
(a) revoke bail granted under this section and remand the person in custody, or
(b) vary an order under subsection (2).
(1) Where—
(a) a court revokes a person’s bail under this Part, and
(b) that person is not before the court when his bail is revoked,
the court must order him to surrender himself forthwith to the custody of the court.
(2) Where a person surrenders himself into the custody of the court in compliance with an order under subsection (1), the court must remand him in custody.
(3) A person who has been ordered to surrender to custody under subsection (1) may be arrested without a warrant by an officer if he fails without reasonable cause to surrender to custody in accordance with the order.
(4) A person arrested under subsection (3) must be brought as soon as practicable, and, in any event, not more than 24 hours after he is arrested, before the court and the court must remand him in custody.
(5) For the purpose of calculating the period referred to in subsection (4), the following are to be disregarded—
(za) Saturday,
(a) Sunday,
(b) Christmas Day,
(c) Good Friday,
(d) any day which is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 (c. 80) in the part of the United Kingdom where the person is for the time being detained.
(1) Section 1(7) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 (c. 23) (DPP’s functions exercisable by Crown Prosecutor) does not apply to the provisions of this Part other than section 85(2)(a).
(2) In the absence of the Director of Public Prosecutions, his functions under those provisions may be exercised by a person authorised by him.
(3) An authorisation under subsection (2)—
(a) may relate to a specified person or to persons of a specified description, and
(b) may be general or relate to a specified function or specified circumstances.
(1) Rules of court may make such provision as appears to the authority making them to be necessary or expedient for the purposes of this Part.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), rules of court may in particular make provision as to procedures to be applied in connection with sections 76 to 82, 84 and 88 to 90.
(3) Nothing in this section is to be taken as affecting the generality of any enactment conferring power to make rules of court.
(1) Section 323 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (provision in consequence of criminal justice enactments) applies in relation to an enactment contained in this Part so far as relating to matters not specified in subsection (2) of section 324 of that Act as it applies in relation to a criminal justice enactment (within the meaning given by that section).
(2) The power under section 323 of that Act to make provision equivalent to that made in relation to qualifying offences by an enactment contained in this Part (with or without modifications) includes power to make such provision in relation to such service offences as the Secretary of State thinks fit.
(3) In subsection (2) “service offence” has the same meaning as in the Armed Forces Act 2006.
(1) In this Part—
“the 1984 Act” means the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60),
“acquittal” and related expressions are to be read in accordance with section 75(7),
“customs and excise officer” means an officer as defined by section 1(1) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2), or a person to whom section 8(2) of that Act applies,
“new evidence” is to be read in accordance with section 78(2),
“officer”, except in section 83, means an officer of a police force or a customs and excise officer,
“police force” has the meaning given by section 3(3) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 (c. 23),
“prosecutor” means an individual or body charged with duties to conduct criminal prosecutions,
“qualifying offence” has the meaning given by section 75(8).
(2) Subject to rules of court made under section 53(1) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 (c. 54) (power by rules to distribute business of Court of Appeal between its civil and criminal divisions)—
(a) the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal under this Part is to be exercised by the criminal division of that court, and
(b) references in this Part to the Court of Appeal are to be construed as references to that division.
(3) References in this Part to an officer of a specified rank or above are, in the case of a customs and excise officer, references to an officer of such description as—
(a) appears to the Commissioners of Customs and Excise to comprise officers of equivalent rank or above, and
(b) is specified by the Commissioners for the purposes of the provision concerned.
(1) In its application to Northern Ireland this Part is to have effect subject to the modifications in this section.
(2) In sections 75(1)(a) and (b), 76(2)(a), 79(3) and 85(2)(a) for “England and Wales” substitute “ Northern Ireland ”.
(3) For section 75(2)(c) substitute—
(c) in respect of which, in proceedings where he has been found to be unfit to be tried in accordance with Article 49 of the Mental Health (Northern Ireland) Order 1986 (S.I. 1986/595 (N.I. 4)), a finding has been made that he did the act or made the omission charged against him.
(4) In section 75(8) for “Part 1” substitute “ Part 2 ”.
(5) In section 81(1) for “Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (c. 19)” substitute “ Criminal Appeal (Northern Ireland) Act 1980 (c. 47) ”.
(6) In section 81(2)—
(a) for “33” substitute “ 31 ”, and
(b) for “An” substitute “ Subject to the provisions of this Part of this Act, an ”.
(7) In section 81(4)—
(a) for “34(2)” substitute “ 32(2) ”, and
(b) for “33(1B)” substitute “ 31(1B) ”.
(8) In section 82(10) after “enactment” in each place insert “ (including any provision of Northern Ireland legislation) ”.
(9) In section 84(1) and (2) for “preferred” substitute “ presented ”.
(10) Section 84(6) has effect—
(a) as if any reference to a provision of Part 11 were a reference to any corresponding provision contained in an Order in Council to which section 334(1) applies, at any time when such corresponding provision is in force;
(b) at any other time, with the omission of paragraphs (b) and (c).
(11) After section 84(6) insert—
(6A) Article 29 of the Legal Aid, Advice and Assistance (Northern Ireland) Order 1981 (S.I. 1981/228 (N.I. 8)) applies in the case of a person who is to be tried in accordance with subsection (1) as if—
(a) he had been returned for trial for the offence in question, and
(b) the reference in paragraph (2)(a) of that Article to a magistrates' court included a reference to the Court of Appeal.
(12) In section 87—
(a) in subsection (3), for “Part 4 of the 1984 Act” substitute “ Part 5 of the Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 (S. I. 1989/1341 (N. I. 12)) (“the 1989 Order”) ”,
(b) in paragraph (b) of that subsection, for “section 34(7) of that Act” substitute “ Article 35(8) of that Order ”,
(c) in subsection (6)—
(i) for the words from the beginning to “40(8) of that Act)” substitute “ Article 38 of that Order (including any provision of that Article as applied by Article 41(8) of that Order) ”,
(ii) for “subsection” in each place substitute “paragraph ,
(iii) in paragraph (e), for “subsections (7A), (7B) and (8)” substitute “ paragraph (8) ”, and
(iv) in paragraph (f), in the inserted paragraph (10A) omit “above”,
(d) for subsection (7) substitute—
(7) Article 41 of that Order has effect as if in paragraphs (8) and (9) of that Article after “(6)” there were inserted “and (10A).
,
(e) in subsection (8)—
(i) for “Section 42 of that Act” substitute “ Article 43 of that Order ”, and
(ii) for “subsection (1) of that section” substitute “ paragraph (1) of that Article ”.
(13) For section 88(1) substitute—
(1) In relation to a person charged in accordance with section 87(4)—
(a) Article 39 of the 1989 Order (including any provision of that Article as applied by Article 41(10) of that Order) has effect as if, in paragraph (1), for “either on bail or without bail” there were substituted “ on bail ”,
(b) Article 48 of that Order has effect as if for paragraphs (1) to (11) there were substituted—
(1) A person who is released on bail shall be subject to a duty to appear before the Crown Court at such place as the custody officer may appoint and at such time, not later than 24 hours after the person is released, as that officer may appoint.
(2) The custody officer may require a person who is to be released on bail to enter into a recognisance conditioned upon his subsequent appearance before the Crown Court in accordance with paragraph (1).
(3) A recognisance under paragraph (2) may be taken before the custody officer.
, and
(c) Article 132A of the Magistrates' Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981 (S.I. 1981/1675 (N.I. 26)) does not apply.
(14) In section 88(2)—
(a) for paragraph (b) substitute—
(b) detained in a place of safety in pursuance of arrangements made under Article 39(6) of the 1989 Order,
, and
(b) for “section 46 of the 1984 Act” substitute “ Article 47 of the 1989 Order ”.
(15) In section 89(6) for “section 81(5) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 (c. 54)” substitute “ section 51(8) of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 (c. 23) ”.
(16) For section 90(4) substitute—
(4) The court may at any time, as it sees fit, vary the conditions of bail granted under this section.
(17) In section 92(1) for the words from the beginning to “does” substitute “ Sections 30(4) and 36 of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 (c. 26) do ”.
(18) Until the coming into force of section 36 of that Act of 2002 the reference to that section in subsection (17) is to be read as a reference to Article 4(8) of the Prosecution of Offences (Northern Ireland) Order 1972 (S.I. 1972/538 (N.I. 1)).
(19) In section 93(2) for “the Criminal Appeal Rules and the Crown Court Rules” substitute “ rules under section 55 of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 and Crown Court Rules ”.
(20) In section 93(3) after “enactment” insert “ (including any provision of Northern Ireland legislation) ”.
(21) In section 95(1) for the definition of “police force” substitute—
“police force” means—
(a) the Police Service of Northern Ireland or the Police Service of Northern Ireland Reserve,
(b) the Ministry of Defence Police,
(c) any body of constables appointed under Article 19 of the Airports (Northern Ireland) Order 1994 (S.I. 1994/426 (N.I. 1)), or
(d) any body of special constables appointed in Northern Ireland under section 79 of the Harbours, Docks and Piers Clauses Act 1847 (c. 27) or section 57 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 (c. 16),
.
(22) Omit section 95(2).
97 Application of Criminal Appeal Acts to proceedings under Part 10
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Part, the Secretary of State may make an order containing provision, in relation to proceedings in England and Wales before the Court of Appeal under this Part, which corresponds to any provision, in relation to appeals or other proceedings before that court, which is contained in the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (c. 19). . . (subject to any specified modifications).
(2) Subject to the provisions of this Part, the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland may make an order containing provision, in relation to proceedings in Northern Ireland before the Court of Appeal under this Part, which corresponds to any provision, in relation to appeals or other proceedings before that court, which is contained in the Criminal Appeal (Northern Ireland) Act 1980 (subject to any specified modifications).
References in this Chapter to evidence of a person’s “bad character” are to evidence of, or of a disposition towards, misconduct on his part, other than evidence which—
(a) has to do with the alleged facts of the offence with which the defendant is charged, or
(b) is evidence of misconduct in connection with the investigation or prosecution of that offence.
(1) The common law rules governing the admissibility of evidence of bad character in criminal proceedings are abolished.
(2) Subsection (1) is subject to section 118(1) in so far as it preserves the rule under which in criminal proceedings a person’s reputation is admissible for the purposes of proving his bad character.
(1) In criminal proceedings evidence of the bad character of a person other than the defendant is admissible if and only if—
(a) it is important explanatory evidence,
(b) it has substantial probative value in relation to a matter which—
(i) is a matter in issue in the proceedings, and
(ii) is of substantial importance in the context of the case as a whole,
or
(c) all parties to the proceedings agree to the evidence being admissible.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a) evidence is important explanatory evidence if—
(a) without it, the court or jury would find it impossible or difficult properly to understand other evidence in the case, and
(b) its value for understanding the case as a whole is substantial.
(3) In assessing the probative value of evidence for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) the court must have regard to the following factors (and to any others it considers relevant)—
(a) the nature and number of the events, or other things, to which the evidence relates;
(b) when those events or things are alleged to have happened or existed;
(c) where—
(i) the evidence is evidence of a person’s misconduct, and
(ii) it is suggested that the evidence has probative value by reason of similarity between that misconduct and other alleged misconduct,
the nature and extent of the similarities and the dissimilarities between each of the alleged instances of misconduct;
(d) where—
(i) the evidence is evidence of a person’s misconduct,
(ii) it is suggested that that person is also responsible for the misconduct charged, and
(iii) the identity of the person responsible for the misconduct charged is disputed,
the extent to which the evidence shows or tends to show that the same person was responsible each time.
(4) Except where subsection (1)(c) applies, evidence of the bad character of a person other than the defendant must not be given without leave of the court.
(1) In criminal proceedings evidence of the defendant’s bad character is admissible if, but only if—
(a) all parties to the proceedings agree to the evidence being admissible,
(b) the evidence is adduced by the defendant himself or is given in answer to a question asked by him in cross-examination and intended to elicit it,
(c) it is important explanatory evidence,
(d) it is relevant to an important matter in issue between the defendant and the prosecution,
(e) it has substantial probative value in relation to an important matter in issue between the defendant and a co-defendant,
(f) it is evidence to correct a false impression given by the defendant, or
(g) the defendant has made an attack on another person’s character.
(2) Sections 102 to 106 contain provision supplementing subsection (1).
(3) The court must not admit evidence under subsection (1)(d) or (g) if, on an application by the defendant to exclude it, it appears to the court that the admission of the evidence would have such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings that the court ought not to admit it.
(4) On an application to exclude evidence under subsection (3) the court must have regard, in particular, to the length of time between the matters to which that evidence relates and the matters which form the subject of the offence charged.
For the purposes of section 101(1)(c) evidence is important explanatory evidence if—
(a) without it, the court or jury would find it impossible or difficult properly to understand other evidence in the case, and
(b) its value for understanding the case as a whole is substantial.
103 “Matter in issue between the defendant and the prosecution”
(1) For the purposes of section 101(1)(d) the matters in issue between the defendant and the prosecution include—
(a) the question whether the defendant has a propensity to commit offences of the kind with which he is charged, except where his having such a propensity makes it no more likely that he is guilty of the offence;
(b) the question whether the defendant has a propensity to be untruthful, except where it is not suggested that the defendant’s case is untruthful in any respect.
(2) Where subsection (1)(a) applies, a defendant’s propensity to commit offences of the kind with which he is charged may (without prejudice to any other way of doing so) be established by evidence that he has been convicted of—
(a) an offence of the same description as the one with which he is charged, or
(b) an offence of the same category as the one with which he is charged.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply in the case of a particular defendant if the court is satisfied, by reason of the length of time since the conviction or for any other reason, that it would be unjust for it to apply in his case.
(4) For the purposes of subsection (2)—
(a) two offences are of the same description as each other if the statement of the offence in a written charge or indictment would, in each case, be in the same terms;
(b) two offences are of the same category as each other if they belong to the same category of offences prescribed for the purposes of this section by an order made by the Secretary of State.
(5) A category prescribed by an order under subsection (4)(b) must consist of offences of the same type.
(6) Only prosecution evidence is admissible under section 101(1)(d).
(7) Where—
(a) a defendant has been convicted of an offence under the law of any country outside England and Wales (“the previous offence”), and
(b) the previous offence would constitute an offence under the law of England and Wales (“the corresponding offence”) if it were done in England and Wales at the time of the trial for the offence with which the defendant is now charged (“the current offence”),
subsection (8) applies for the purpose of determining if the previous offence and the current offence are of the same description or category.
(8) For the purposes of subsection (2)—
(a) the previous offence is of the same description as the current offence if the corresponding offence is of that same description, as set out in subsection (4)(a);
(b) the previous offence is of the same category as the current offence if the current offence and the corresponding offence belong to the same category of offences prescribed as mentioned in subsection (4)(b).
(9) For the purposes of subsection (10) “foreign service offence” means an offence which—
(a) was the subject of proceedings under the service law of a country outside the United Kingdom, and
(b) would constitute an offence under the law of England and Wales or a service offence (“the corresponding domestic offence”) if it were done in England and Wales by a member of Her Majesty's forces at the time of the trial for the offence with which the defendant is now charged (“the current offence”).
(10) Where a defendant has been found guilty of a foreign service offence (“the previous service offence”), for the purposes of subsection (2)—
(a) the previous service offence is an offence of the same description as the current offence if the corresponding domestic offence is of that same description, as set out in subsection (4)(a);
(b) the previous service offence is an offence of the same category as the current offence if the current offence and the corresponding domestic offence belong to the same category of offences prescribed as mentioned in subsection (4)(b).
(11) In this section—
“Her Majesty's forces” has the same meaning as in the Armed Forces Act 2006;
“service law”, in relation to a country outside the United Kingdom, means the law governing all or any of the naval, military or air forces of that country.
104 “Matter in issue between the defendant and a co-defendant”
(1) Evidence which is relevant to the question whether the defendant has a propensity to be untruthful is admissible on that basis under section 101(1)(e) only if the nature or conduct of his defence is such as to undermine the co-defendant’s defence.
(2) Only evidence—
(a) which is to be (or has been) adduced by the co-defendant, or
(b) which a witness is to be invited to give (or has given) in cross-examination by the co-defendant,
is admissible under section 101(1)(e).
(1) For the purposes of section 101(1)(f)—
(a) the defendant gives a false impression if he is responsible for the making of an express or implied assertion which is apt to give the court or jury a false or misleading impression about the defendant;
(b) evidence to correct such an impression is evidence which has probative value in correcting it.
(2) A defendant is treated as being responsible for the making of an assertion if—
(a) the assertion is made by the defendant in the proceedings (whether or not in evidence given by him),
(b) the assertion was made by the defendant—
(i) on being questioned under caution, before charge, about the offence with which he is charged, or
(ii) on being charged with the offence or officially informed that he might be prosecuted for it,
and evidence of the assertion is given in the proceedings,
(c) the assertion is made by a witness called by the defendant,
(d) the assertion is made by any witness in cross-examination in response to a question asked by the defendant that is intended to elicit it, or is likely to do so, or
(e) the assertion was made by any person out of court, and the defendant adduces evidence of it in the proceedings.
(3) A defendant who would otherwise be treated as responsible for the making of an assertion shall not be so treated if, or to the extent that, he withdraws it or disassociates himself from it.
(4) Where it appears to the court that a defendant, by means of his conduct (other than the giving of evidence) in the proceedings, is seeking to give the court or jury an impression about himself that is false or misleading, the court may if it appears just to do so treat the defendant as being responsible for the making of an assertion which is apt to give that impression.
(5) In subsection (4) “conduct” includes appearance or dress.
(6) Evidence is admissible under section 101(1)(f) only if it goes no further than is necessary to correct the false impression.
(7) Only prosecution evidence is admissible under section 101(1)(f).
(1) For the purposes of section 101(1)(g) a defendant makes an attack on another person’s character if—
(a) he adduces evidence attacking the other person’s character,
(b) he (or any legal representative appointed under section 38(4) of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (c. 23) to cross-examine a witness in his interests) asks questions in cross-examination that are intended to elicit such evidence, or are likely to do so, or
(c) evidence is given of an imputation about the other person made by the defendant—
(i) on being questioned under caution, before charge, about the offence with which he is charged, or
(ii) on being charged with the offence or officially informed that he might be prosecuted for it.
(2) In subsection (1) “evidence attacking the other person’s character” means evidence to the effect that the other person—
(a) has committed an offence (whether a different offence from the one with which the defendant is charged or the same one), or
(b) has behaved, or is disposed to behave, in a reprehensible way;
and “imputation about the other person” means an assertion to that effect.
(3) Only prosecution evidence is admissible under section 101(1)(g).
(1) If on a defendant’s trial before a judge and jury for an offence—
(a) evidence of his bad character has been admitted under any of paragraphs (c) to (g) of section 101(1), and
(b) the court is satisfied at any time after the close of the case for the prosecution that—
(i) the evidence is contaminated, and
(ii) the contamination is such that, considering the importance of the evidence to the case against the defendant, his conviction of the offence would be unsafe,
the court must either direct the jury to acquit the defendant of the offence or, if it considers that there ought to be a retrial, discharge the jury.
(2) Where—
(a) a jury is directed under subsection (1) to acquit a defendant of an offence, and
(b) the circumstances are such that, apart from this subsection, the defendant could if acquitted of that offence be found guilty of another offence,
the defendant may not be found guilty of that other offence if the court is satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1)(b) in respect of it.
(3) If—
(a) a jury is required to determine under section 4A(2) of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 (c. 84) whether a person charged on an indictment with an offence did the act or made the omission charged,
(b) evidence of the person’s bad character has been admitted under any of paragraphs (c) to (g) of section 101(1), and
(c) the court is satisfied at any time after the close of the case for the prosecution that—
(i) the evidence is contaminated, and
(ii) the contamination is such that, considering the importance of the evidence to the case against the person, a finding that he did the act or made the omission would be unsafe,
the court must either direct the jury to acquit the defendant of the offence or, if it considers that there ought to be a rehearing, discharge the jury.
(4) This section does not prejudice any other power a court may have to direct a jury to acquit a person of an offence or to discharge a jury.
(5) For the purposes of this section a person’s evidence is contaminated where—
(a) as a result of an agreement or understanding between the person and one or more others, or
(b) as a result of the person being aware of anything alleged by one or more others whose evidence may be, or has been, given in the proceedings,
the evidence is false or misleading in any respect, or is different from what it would otherwise have been.
(1) Section 16(2) and (3) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1963 (c. 37) (offences committed by person under 14 disregarded for purposes of evidence relating to previous convictions) shall cease to have effect.
(2) In proceedings for an offence committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant when aged 21 or over, evidence of his conviction for an offence when under the age of 14 is not admissible unless—
(a) both of the offences are triable only on indictment, and
(b) the court is satisfied that the interests of justice require the evidence to be admissible.
(2A) Subsection (2B) applies where—
(a) the defendant has been convicted of an offence under the law of any country outside England and Wales (“the previous offence”), and
(b) the previous offence would constitute an offence under the law of England and Wales (“the corresponding offence”) if it were done in England and Wales at the time of the proceedings for the offence with which the defendant is now charged.
(2B) For the purposes of subsection (2), the previous offence is to be regarded as triable only on indictment if the corresponding offence is so triable.
(3) Subsection (2) applies in addition to section 101.
109 Assumption of truth in assessment of relevance or probative value
(1) Subject to subsection (2), a reference in this Chapter to the relevance or probative value of evidence is a reference to its relevance or probative value on the assumption that it is true.
(2) In assessing the relevance or probative value of an item of evidence for any purpose of this Chapter, a court need not assume that the evidence is true if it appears, on the basis of any material before the court (including any evidence it decides to hear on the matter), that no court or jury could reasonably find it to be true.
(1) Where the court makes a relevant ruling—
(a) it must state in open court (but in the absence of the jury, if there is one) its reasons for the ruling;
(b) if it is a magistrates' court, it must cause the ruling and the reasons for it to be entered in the register of the court’s proceedings.
(2) In this section “relevant ruling” means—
(a) a ruling on whether an item of evidence is evidence of a person’s bad character;
(b) a ruling on whether an item of such evidence is admissible under section 100 or 101 (including a ruling on an application under section 101(3));
(c) a ruling under section 107.
(1) Rules of court may make such provision as appears to the appropriate authority to be necessary or expedient for the purposes of this Act; and the appropriate authority is the authority entitled to make the rules.
(2) The rules may, and, where the party in question is the prosecution, must, contain provision requiring a party who—
(a) proposes to adduce evidence of a defendant’s bad character, or
(b) proposes to cross-examine a witness with a view to eliciting such evidence,
to serve on the defendant such notice, and such particulars of or relating to the evidence, as may be prescribed.
(3) The rules may provide that the court or the defendant may, in such circumstances as may be prescribed, dispense with a requirement imposed by virtue of subsection (2).
(4) In considering the exercise of its powers with respect to costs, the court may take into account any failure by a party to comply with a requirement imposed by virtue of subsection (2) and not dispensed with by virtue of subsection (3).
(5) The rules may—
(a) limit the application of any provision of the rules to prescribed circumstances;
(b) subject any provision of the rules to prescribed exceptions;
(c) make different provision for different cases or circumstances.
(6) Nothing in this section prejudices the generality of any enactment conferring power to make rules of court; and no particular provision of this section prejudices any general provision of it.
(7) In this section “prescribed” means prescribed by rules of court.
(1) In this Chapter—
“bad character” is to be read in accordance with section 98;
“criminal proceedings” means criminal proceedings in relation to which the strict rules of evidence apply;
“defendant”, in relation to criminal proceedings, means a person charged with an offence in those proceedings; and “co-defendant”, in relation to a defendant, means a person charged with an offence in the same proceedings;
“important matter” means a matter of substantial importance in the context of the case as a whole;
“misconduct” means the commission of an offence or other reprehensible behaviour;
“offence” includes a service offence;
“probative value”, and “relevant” (in relation to an item of evidence), are to be read in accordance with section 109;
“prosecution evidence” means evidence which is to be (or has been) adduced by the prosecution, or which a witness is to be invited to give (or has given) in cross-examination by the prosecution;
“service offence” has the same meaning as in the Armed Forces Act 2006;
“written charge” has the same meaning as in section 29 and also includes an information.
(2) Where a defendant is charged with two or more offences in the same criminal proceedings, this Chapter (except section 101(3)) has effect as if each offence were charged in separate proceedings; and references to the offence with which the defendant is charged are to be read accordingly.
(3) Nothing in this Chapter affects the exclusion of evidence—
(a) under the rule in section 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1865 (c. 18) against a party impeaching the credit of his own witness by general evidence of bad character,
(b) under section 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (c. 23) (restriction on evidence or questions about complainant’s sexual history), or
(c) on grounds other than the fact that it is evidence of a person’s bad character.
(1) In criminal proceedings a statement not made in oral evidence in the proceedings is admissible as evidence of any matter stated if, but only if—
(a) any provision of this Chapter or any other statutory provision makes it admissible,
(b) any rule of law preserved by section 118 makes it admissible,
(c) all parties to the proceedings agree to it being admissible, or
(d) the court is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice for it to be admissible.
(2) In deciding whether a statement not made in oral evidence should be admitted under subsection (1)(d), the court must have regard to the following factors (and to any others it considers relevant)—
(a) how much probative value the statement has (assuming it to be true) in relation to a matter in issue in the proceedings, or how valuable it is for the understanding of other evidence in the case;
(b) what other evidence has been, or can be, given on the matter or evidence mentioned in paragraph (a);
(c) how important the matter or evidence mentioned in paragraph (a) is in the context of the case as a whole;
(d) the circumstances in which the statement was made;
(e) how reliable the maker of the statement appears to be;
(f) how reliable the evidence of the making of the statement appears to be;
(g) whether oral evidence of the matter stated can be given and, if not, why it cannot;
(h) the amount of difficulty involved in challenging the statement;
(i) the extent to which that difficulty would be likely to prejudice the party facing it.
(3) Nothing in this Chapter affects the exclusion of evidence of a statement on grounds other than the fact that it is a statement not made in oral evidence in the proceedings.
(1) In this Chapter references to a statement or to a matter stated are to be read as follows.
(2) A statement is any representation of fact or opinion made by a person by whatever means; and it includes a representation made in a sketch, photofit or other pictorial form.
(3) A matter stated is one to which this Chapter applies if (and only if) the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the person making the statement appears to the court to have been—
(a) to cause another person to believe the matter, or
(b) to cause another person to act or a machine to operate on the basis that the matter is as stated.
(1) In criminal proceedings a statement not made in oral evidence in the proceedings is admissible as evidence of any matter stated if—
(a) oral evidence given in the proceedings by the person who made the statement would be admissible as evidence of that matter,
(b) the person who made the statement (the relevant person) is identified to the court’s satisfaction, and
(c) any of the five conditions mentioned in subsection (2) is satisfied.
(2) The conditions are—
(a) that the relevant person is dead;
(b) that the relevant person is unfit to be a witness because of his bodily or mental condition;
(c) that the relevant person is outside the United Kingdom and it is not reasonably practicable to secure his attendance;
(d) that the relevant person cannot be found although such steps as it is reasonably practicable to take to find him have been taken;
(e) that through fear the relevant person does not give (or does not continue to give) oral evidence in the proceedings, either at all or in connection with the subject matter of the statement, and the court gives leave for the statement to be given in evidence.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(e) “fear” is to be widely construed and (for example) includes fear of the death or injury of another person or of financial loss.
(4) Leave may be given under subsection (2)(e) only if the court considers that the statement ought to be admitted in the interests of justice, having regard—
(a) to the statement’s contents,
(b) to any risk that its admission or exclusion will result in unfairness to any party to the proceedings (and in particular to how difficult it will be to challenge the statement if the relevant person does not give oral evidence),
(c) in appropriate cases, to the fact that a direction under section 19 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (c. 23) (special measures for the giving of evidence by fearful witnesses etc) could be made in relation to the relevant person, and
(d) to any other relevant circumstances.
(5) A condition set out in any paragraph of subsection (2) which is in fact satisfied is to be treated as not satisfied if it is shown that the circumstances described in that paragraph are caused—
(a) by the person in support of whose case it is sought to give the statement in evidence, or
(b) by a person acting on his behalf,
in order to prevent the relevant person giving oral evidence in the proceedings (whether at all or in connection with the subject matter of the statement).
(1) In criminal proceedings a statement contained in a document is admissible as evidence of any matter stated if—
(a) oral evidence given in the proceedings would be admissible as evidence of that matter,
(b) the requirements of subsection (2) are satisfied, and
(c) the requirements of subsection (5) are satisfied, in a case where subsection (4) requires them to be.
(2) The requirements of this subsection are satisfied if—
(a) the document or the part containing the statement was created or received by a person in the course of a trade, business, profession or other occupation, or as the holder of a paid or unpaid office,
(b) the person who supplied the information contained in the statement (the relevant person) had or may reasonably be supposed to have had personal knowledge of the matters dealt with, and
(c) each person (if any) through whom the information was supplied from the relevant person to the person mentioned in paragraph (a) received the information in the course of a trade, business, profession or other occupation, or as the holder of a paid or unpaid office.
(3) The persons mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (2) may be the same person.
(4) The additional requirements of subsection (5) must be satisfied if the statement—
(a) was prepared for the purposes of pending or contemplated criminal proceedings, or for a criminal investigation, but
(b) was not obtained pursuant to—
(i) a request under section 7 of the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003,
(ii) an order under paragraph 6 of Schedule 13 to the Criminal Justice Act 1988,...
(iii) ..., or
(iv) an overseas production order under the Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Act 2019,
(all of which relate to overseas evidence)
(5) The requirements of this subsection are satisfied if—
(a) any of the five conditions mentioned in section 116(2) is satisfied (absence of relevant person etc), or
(b) the relevant person cannot reasonably be expected to have any recollection of the matters dealt with in the statement (having regard to the length of time since he supplied the information and all other circumstances).
(6) A statement is not admissible under this section if the court makes a direction to that effect under subsection (7).
(7) The court may make a direction under this subsection if satisfied that the statement’s reliability as evidence for the purpose for which it is tendered is doubtful in view of—
(a) its contents,
(b) the source of the information contained in it,
(c) the way in which or the circumstances in which the information was supplied or received, or
(d) the way in which or the circumstances in which the document concerned was created or received.
118 Preservation of certain common law categories of admissibility
(1) The following rules of law are preserved.
Public information etc
1 Any rule of law under which in criminal proceedings—
(a) published works dealing with matters of a public nature (such as histories, scientific works, dictionaries and maps) are admissible as evidence of facts of a public nature stated in them,
(b) public documents (such as public registers, and returns made under public authority with respect to matters of public interest) are admissible as evidence of facts stated in them,
(c) records (such as the records of certain courts, treaties, Crown grants, pardons and commissions) are admissible as evidence of facts stated in them, or
(d) evidence relating to a person’s age or date or place of birth may be given by a person without personal knowledge of the matter.
Reputation as to character
2 Any rule of law under which in criminal proceedings evidence of a person’s reputation is admissible for the purpose of proving his good or bad character.
Note
The rule is preserved only so far as it allows the court to treat such evidence as proving the matter concerned.
Reputation or family tradition
3 Any rule of law under which in criminal proceedings evidence of reputation or family tradition is admissible for the purpose of proving or disproving—
(a) pedigree or the existence of a marriage,
(b) the existence of any public or general right, or
(c) the identity of any person or thing.
Note
The rule is preserved only so far as it allows the court to treat such evidence as proving or disproving the matter concerned.
Res gestae
4 Any rule of law under which in criminal proceedings a statement is admissible as evidence of any matter stated if—
(a) the statement was made by a person so emotionally overpowered by an event that the possibility of concoction or distortion can be disregarded,
(b) the statement accompanied an act which can be properly evaluated as evidence only if considered in conjunction with the statement, or
(c) the statement relates to a physical sensation or a mental state (such as intention or emotion).
Confessions etc
5 Any rule of law relating to the admissibility of confessions or mixed statements in criminal proceedings.
Admissions by agents etc
6 Any rule of law under which in criminal proceedings—
(a) an admission made by an agent of a defendant is admissible against the defendant as evidence of any matter stated, or
(b) a statement made by a person to whom a defendant refers a person for information is admissible against the defendant as evidence of any matter stated.
Common enterprise
7 Any rule of law under which in criminal proceedings a statement made by a party to a common enterprise is admissible against another party to the enterprise as evidence of any matter stated.
Expert evidence
8 Any rule of law under which in criminal proceedings an expert witness may draw on the body of expertise relevant to his field.
(2) With the exception of the rules preserved by this section, the common law rules governing the admissibility of hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings are abolished.