(1) If the court postpones proceedings under section 92 it may proceed to sentence the accused for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned.
(2) Subsection (1) is without prejudice to sections 201 and 202 of the Procedure Act.
(3) In sentencing the accused for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned in the postponement period the court must not—
(a) impose a fine on him,
(b) make an order falling within section 97(3),...
(c) make an order for the payment of compensation under section 249 of the Procedure Act.
(d) make a restitution order, or
(e) order the accused under section 253F(2) of the Procedure Act to pay a victim surcharge.
(4) If the court sentences the accused for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned in the postponement period, after that period ends it may vary the sentence by—
(a) imposing a fine on him,
(b) making an order falling within section 97(3), ...
(c) making an order for the payment of compensation under section 249 of the Procedure Act.
(d) making a restitution order, or
(e) ordering the accused under section 253F(2) of the Procedure Act to pay a victim surcharge.
(5) But the court may proceed under subsection (4) only within the period of 28 days which starts with the last day of the postponement period.
(6) Where the court postpones proceedings under section 92 following conviction on indictment, section 109(1) of the Procedure Act (intimation of intention to appeal against conviction or conviction and sentence) has effect as if the reference to the final determination of the proceedings were a reference to the relevant day.
(7) Despite subsection (6), the accused may appeal under section 106 of the Procedure Act against any confiscation order made, or any other sentence passed, after the end of the postponement period, in respect of the conviction.
(8) Where the court postpones proceedings under section 92 following conviction on complaint—
(a) section 176(1) of the Procedure Act (stated case: manner and time of appeal) has effect in relation to an appeal under section 175(2)(a) or (d) as if the reference to the final determination of the proceedings were a reference to the relevant day, and
(b) the draft stated case in such an appeal must be prepared and issued within 3 weeks of the relevant day.
(9) Despite subsection (8), the accused may appeal under section 175(2)(b), and the prosecutor may appeal under section 175(3)(b), of the Procedure Act against any confiscation order made, or any other sentence passed, after the end of the postponement period, in respect of the conviction.
(10) The relevant day is—
(a) in the case of an appeal against conviction where the court has sentenced the accused under subsection (1), the day on which the postponement period commenced;
(b) in any other case, the day on which sentence is passed in open court.
(11) The postponement period is the period for which proceedings under section 92 are postponed.
(1) When the court is proceeding under section 92 the prosecutor must, within such period as the court may order, give the court a statement of information.
(2) If the prosecutor believes the accused has a criminal lifestyle the statement of information is a statement of matters the prosecutor believes are relevant in connection with deciding these issues—
(a) whether the accused has a criminal lifestyle;
(b) whether he has benefited from his general criminal conduct;
(c) his benefit from the conduct.
(3) A statement under subsection (2) must include information the prosecutor believes is relevant—
(a) in connection with the making by the court of a required assumption under section 96;
(b) for the purpose of enabling the court to decide if the circumstances are such that it must not make such an assumption.
(4) If the prosecutor does not believe the accused has a criminal lifestyle the statement of information is a statement of matters the prosecutor believes are relevant in connection with deciding these issues—
(a) whether the accused has benefited from his particular criminal conduct;
(b) his benefit from the conduct.
(5) If the prosecutor gives the court a statement of information—
(a) he may at any time give the court a further statement of information;
(b) he must give the court a further statement of information if it orders him to do so, and he must give it within the period the court orders.
(6) If the court makes an order under this section it may at any time vary it by making another one.
102 Accused’s response to statement of information
(1) When the prosecutor gives the court a statement of information and the court is satisfied that he has served a copy on the accused, the court shall order the accused—
(a) to indicate the extent to which he accepts each allegation in the statement, and
(b) so far as he does not accept such an allegation, to give particulars of any matters he proposes to rely on,
within the period it orders.
(2) Where by virtue of section 99 the court postpones proceedings under section 92, the period ordered by the court under subsection (1) shall be a period ending not less than six months before the end of the permitted period mentioned in section 99.
(3) If the accused accepts to any extent an allegation in a statement of information the court may treat his acceptance as conclusive of the matters to which it relates for the purpose of deciding the issues referred to in section 101(2) or (4) (as the case may be).
(4) If the accused fails in any respect to comply with an order under subsection (1) he may be treated for the purposes of subsection (3) as accepting every allegation in the statement of information apart from—
(a) any allegation in respect of which he has complied with the requirement;
(b) any allegation that he has benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct.
(5) Where—
(a) an allegation in a statement of information is challenged by the accused, or
(b) the matters referred to in subsection (1)(b) are challenged by the prosecutor,
the court must consider the matters being challenged at a hearing.
(6) The judge presiding at the hearing may, if he is not the trial judge and he considers it in the interests of justice to do so, adjourn the hearing to a date when the trial judge is available.
(7) If the court makes an order under this section it may at any time vary it by making another one.
(8) No acceptance under this section that the accused has benefited from conduct is admissible in evidence in proceedings for an offence.
(1) For the purpose of obtaining information to help it in carrying out its functions under section 92 the court may at any time order the accused to give it information specified in the order.
(2) An order under this section may require all or a specified part of the information to be given in a specified manner and before a specified date.
(3) If the accused fails without reasonable excuse to comply with an order under this section the court may draw such inference as it thinks appropriate.
(4) Subsection (3) does not affect any power of the court to deal with the accused in respect of a failure to comply with an order under this section.
(5) If the prosecutor accepts to any extent an allegation made by the accused—
(a) in giving information required by an order under this section, or
(b) in any other statement given to the court in relation to any matter relevant to deciding the available amount under section 95,
the court may treat the acceptance as conclusive of the matters to which it relates.
(6) For the purposes of this section an allegation may be accepted in a manner ordered by the court.
(7) If the court makes an order under this section it may at any time vary it by making another order.
(8) No information given under this section which amounts to an admission by the accused that he has benefited from criminal conduct is admissible in evidence in proceedings for an offence.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) the first condition in section 92 is satisfied but no court has proceeded under that section,
(b) the prosecutor has evidence which was not available to him on the relevant date,
(c) before the end of the period of six years starting with the date of conviction the prosecutor applies to the court to consider the evidence, and
(d) after considering the evidence the court thinks it is appropriate for it to proceed under section 92.
(2) The court must proceed under section 92, and when it does so subsections (3) to (8) below apply.
(3) If the court has already sentenced the accused for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned section 92(4) does not apply.
(4) Section 94(2) does not apply, and the rules applying instead are that the court must take account of—
(a) conduct occurring before the relevant date;
(b) property obtained before that date;
(c) property obtained on or after that date if it was obtained as a result of or in connection with conduct occurring before that date.
(5) In relation to the assumptions that the court must make under section 96—
(a) the first and second assumptions do not apply with regard to property first held by the accused on or after the relevant date;
(b) the third assumption does not apply with regard to expenditure incurred by him on or after that date;
(c) the fourth assumption does not apply with regard to property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by him on or after that date.
(6) The recoverable amount for the purposes of section 92 is such amount as—
(a) the court believes is just, but
(b) does not exceed the amount found under section 93.
(7) In arriving at the just amount the court must have regard in particular to—
(a) the amount found under section 93;
(b) any fine imposed on the accused in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(c) any order which falls within section 97(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned and has not already been taken into account by a court in deciding what is the free property held by the accused for the purposes of section 95;
(d) any compensation order which has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 249 of the Procedure Act.
(e) any restitution order which has been made against the accused in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(f) any order under section 253F(2) of the Procedure Act requiring the accused to pay a victim surcharge in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned.
(8) If an order for payment of compensation under section 249 of the Procedure Act has been made against the accused in respect of the offence or offences concerned, section 97(5) and (6) do not apply.
(8A) If a restitution order or an order under section 253F(2) of the Procedure Act has been made against the accused in respect of the offence or offences concerned, section 97A(2) and (4) does not apply.
(9) The relevant date is—
(a) if the court made a decision not to proceed under section 92, the date of the decision;
(b) if the court did not make such a decision, the date of the conviction.
(10) The date of conviction is—
(a) the date on which the accused was convicted of the offence concerned, or
(b) if there are two or more offences and the convictions were on different dates, the date of the latest.
(11) In this section references to the court are to the court which had jurisdiction in respect of the offence or offences concerned to make a confiscation order.
(1) This section applies if the following two conditions are satisfied.
(2) The first condition is that in proceeding under section 92 the court has decided that—
(a) the accused has a criminal lifestyle but has not benefited from his general criminal conduct, or
(b) the accused does not have a criminal lifestyle and has not benefited from his particular criminal conduct.
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) the prosecutor has evidence which was not available to him when the court decided that the accused had not benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct,
(b) before the end of the period of six years starting with the date of conviction the prosecutor applies to the court to consider the evidence, and
(c) after considering the evidence the court concludes that it would have decided that the accused had benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct (as the case may be) if the evidence had been available to it.
(4) If this section applies the court—
(a) must make a fresh decision under section 92(5)(b) or (c) as to whether the accused has benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct (as the case may be);
(b) may make a confiscation order under that section.
(5) Subsections (6) to (11) below apply if the court proceeds under section 92 in pursuance of this section.
(6) If the court has already sentenced the accused for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned section 92(4) does not apply.
(7) Section 94(2) does not apply, and the rules applying instead are that the court must take account of—
(a) conduct occurring before the date of the original decision that the accused had not benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct;
(b) property obtained before that date;
(c) property obtained on or after that date if it was obtained as a result of or in connection with conduct occurring before that date.
(8) In relation to the assumptions that the court must make under section 96—
(a) the first and second assumptions do not apply with regard to property first held by the accused on or after the date of the original decision that the accused had not benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct;
(b) the third assumption does not apply with regard to expenditure incurred by him on or after that date;
(c) the fourth assumption does not apply with regard to property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by him on or after that date.
(9) The recoverable amount for the purposes of section 92 is such amount as—
(a) the court believes is just, but
(b) does not exceed the amount found under section 93.
(10) In arriving at the just amount the court must have regard in particular to—
(a) the amount found under section 93;
(b) any fine imposed on the accused in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(c) any order which falls within section 97(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned and has not already been taken into account by a court in deciding what is the free property held by the accused for the purposes of section 95;
(d) any compensation order which has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 249 of the Procedure Act.
(e) any restitution order which has been made against the accused in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(f) any order under section 253F(2) of the Procedure Act requiring the accused to pay a victim surcharge in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned.
(11) If an order for the payment of compensation under section 249 of the Procedure Act has been made against the accused in respect of the offence or offences concerned, section 97(5) and (6) do not apply.
(11A) If a restitution order or an order under section 253F(2) of the Procedure Act has been made against the accused in respect of the offence or offences concerned, section 97A(2) and (4) does not apply.
(12) The date of conviction is the date found by applying section 104(10).
(13) In this section references to the court are to the court which had jurisdiction in respect of the offence or offences concerned to make a confiscation order.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) there is evidence which was not available to the prosecutor at the relevant time,
(c) the prosecutor believes that if the court were to find the amount of the accused’s benefit in pursuance of this section it would exceed the relevant amount,
(d) before the end of the period of six years starting with the date of conviction the prosecutor applies to the court to consider the evidence, and
(e) after considering the evidence the court thinks it is appropriate for it to proceed under this section.
(2) The court must make a new calculation of the accused’s benefit from the conduct concerned, and when it does so subsections (3) to (5) below apply.
(3) Section 94(2) does not apply, and the rules applying instead are that the court must take account of—
(a) conduct occurring up to the time it decided the accused’s benefit for the purposes of the confiscation order;
(b) property obtained up to that time;
(c) property obtained after that time if it was obtained as a result of or in connection with conduct occurring before that time.
(4) In applying section 94(3) the confiscation order must be ignored.
(5) In relation to the assumptions that the court must make under section 96—
(a) the first and second assumptions do not apply with regard to property first held by the accused after the time the court decided his benefit for the purposes of the confiscation order;
(b) the third assumption does not apply with regard to expenditure incurred by him after that time;
(c) the fourth assumption does not apply with regard to property obtained (or assumed to have been obtained) by him after that time.
(6) If the amount found under the new calculation of the accused’s benefit exceeds the relevant amount the court—
(a) must make a new calculation of the recoverable amount for the purposes of section 92, and
(b) if it exceeds the amount required to be paid under the confiscation order, may vary the order by substituting for the amount required to be paid such amount as it believes just.
(7) In applying subsection (6)(a) the court must—
(a) take the new calculation of the accused’s benefit;
(b) apply section 95 as if references to the time the confiscation order is made were to the time of the new calculation of the recoverable amount and as if references to the date of the confiscation order were to the date of that new calculation.
(8) In applying subsection (6)(b) the court must have regard in particular to—
(a) any fine imposed on the accused for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(b) any order which falls within section 97(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned and has not already been taken into account by a court in deciding what is the free property held by the accused for the purposes of section 95;
(c) any order which has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 249 of the Procedure Act.
(d) any restitution order which has been made against the accused in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(e) any order under section 253F(2) of the Procedure Act requiring the accused to pay a victim surcharge in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned.
(9) But in applying subsection (6)(b) the court—
(a) must not have regard to an order falling within subsection (8)(c) if a court has made a direction under section 97(6);
(b) must not have regard to an order falling within subsection (8)(d) or (e) if a court has made a direction under section 97A(2) or (4).
(10) In deciding under this section whether one amount exceeds another the court must take account of any change in the value of money.
(11) The relevant time is—
(a) when the court calculated the accused’s benefit for the purposes of the confiscation order, if this section has not applied previously;
(b) when the court last calculated the accused’s benefit in pursuance of this section, if this section has applied previously.
(12) The relevant amount is—
(a) the amount found as the accused’s benefit for the purposes of the confiscation order, if this section has not applied previously;
(b) the amount last found as the accused’s benefit in pursuance of this section, if this section has applied previously.
(13) The date of conviction is the date found by applying section 104(10).
107 Order made: reconsideration of available amount
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the amount required to be paid was the amount found under section 93(2), and
(c) the prosecutor applies to the court to make a new calculation of the available amount.
(2) In a case where this section applies the court must make the new calculation, and in doing so it must apply section 95 as if references to the time the confiscation order is made were to the time of the new calculation and as if references to the date of the confiscation order were to the date of the new calculation.
(3) If the amount found under the new calculation exceeds the relevant amount the court may vary the order by substituting for the amount required to be paid such amount as—
(a) it thinks is just, but
(b) does not exceed the amount found as the accused’s benefit from the conduct concerned.
(4) In arriving at the just amount the court must have regard in particular to—
(a) any fine imposed on the accused for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(b) any order which falls within section 97(3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned and has not already been taken into account by a court in deciding what is the free property held by the accused for the purposes of section 95;
(c) any order which has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 249 of the Procedure Act.
(d) any restitution order which has been made against the accused in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned;
(e) any order under section 253F(2) of the Procedure Act requiring the accused to pay a victim surcharge in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned.
(5) But in deciding what is just the court—
(a) must not have regard to an order falling within subsection (4)(c) if a court has made a direction under section 97(6);
(b) must not have regard to an order falling within subsection (4)(d) or (e) if a court has made a direction under section 97A(2) or (4).
(6) In deciding under this section whether one amount exceeds another the court must take account of any change in the value of money.
(7) The relevant amount is—
(a) the amount found as the available amount for the purposes of the confiscation order, if this section has not applied previously;
(b) the amount last found as the available amount in pursuance of this section, if this section has applied previously.
(8) The amount found as the accused’s benefit from the conduct concerned is—
(a) the amount so found when the confiscation order was made, or
(b) if one or more new calculations of the accused’s benefit have been made under section 106 the amount found on the occasion of the last such calculation.
108 Inadequacy of available amount: variation of order
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order, and
(b) the accused or the prosecutor applies to the court to vary the order under this section.
(2) In such a case the court must calculate the available amount and in doing so it must apply section 95 as if references to the time the confiscation order is made were to the time of the calculation and as if references to the date of the confiscation order were to the date of the calculation.
(3) If the court finds that the available amount (as so calculated) is inadequate to meet the amount remaining to be paid it may vary the order by substituting for the amount required to be paid such smaller amount as the court believes is just.
(4) If a person’s estate has been sequestrated or he has been made bankrupt, or if an order for the winding up of a company has been made, the court must take into account the extent to which realisable property held by him or by the company may be distributed among creditors.
(5) The court may disregard any inadequacy which it thinks is attributable (wholly or partly) to anything done by the accused for the purpose of preserving property held by the recipient of a tainted gift from any risk of realisation under this Part.
(6) In subsection (4) “company” means any company which may be wound up under the Insolvency Act 1986 (c. 45) or the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 (S.I. 1989/2405 (N.I. 19)).
109 Inadequacy of available amount: discharge of order
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the prosecutor applies to the court to discharge the order under this section, and
(c) the amount remaining to be paid under the order is less than £1,000.
(2) In such a case the court must calculate the available amount, and in doing so it must apply section 95 as if references to the time the confiscation order is made were to the time of the calculation and as if references to the date of the confiscation order were to the date of the calculation.
(3) If the court—
(a) finds that the available amount (as so calculated) is inadequate to meet the amount remaining to be paid, and
(b) is satisfied that the inadequacy is due wholly to a specified reason or a combination of specified reasons,
it may discharge the confiscation order.
(4) The specified reasons are—
(a) in a case where any of the realisable property consists of money in a currency other than sterling, that fluctuations in currency exchange rates have occurred;
(b) any reason specified by the Scottish Ministers.
(5) The Scottish Ministers may by order vary the amount for the time being specified in subsection (1)(c).
(6) The discharge of a confiscation order under this section does not prevent the making of an application in respect of the order under section 106(1)(d) or 107(1)(c).
(7) Where on such an application the court determines that the order should be varied under section 106(6) or (as the case may be) 107(3), the court may provide that its discharge under this section is revoked.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) the court proceeds under section 92 in pursuance of section 104 or 105, or
(b) the prosecutor applies under section 106.
(2) In such a case—
(a) the prosecutor must give the court a statement of information within such period as the court may specify;
(b) section 101 applies accordingly (with appropriate modifications where the prosecutor applies under section 106);
(c) sections 102 and 103 apply accordingly.
(1) This section applies if an accused is unlawfully at large and, either before or after he became unlawfully at large —
(a) he is convicted of an offence or offences, whether in solemn or summary proceedings, or
(b) in the case of summary proceedings in respect of an offence (without proceeding to conviction) an order is made discharging him absolutely.
(2) If this section applies the court may, on the application of the prosecutor and if it believes it is appropriate for it to do so, proceed under section 92 in the same way as it must proceed if the conditions there mentioned are satisfied; but this is subject to subsection (3).
(3) If the court proceeds under section 92 as applied by this section, this Part has effect with these modifications—
(a) any person the court believes is likely to be affected by an order under section 92 is entitled to appear before the court and make representations;
(b) the court must not make an order under section 92 unless the prosecutor has taken reasonable steps to contact the accused;
(c) section 92(12) applies as if the reference to subsection (2) were to subsection (1) of this section;
(d) sections 96, 101(3), 102 and 103 do not apply;
(e) sections 104, 105 and 106 do not apply while the accused is still unlawfully at large.
(4) Once the accused has ceased to be unlawfully at large—
(a) section 104 has effect as if subsection (1) read—
(1) This section applies if—
(a) in a case where section 111 applies the court did not proceed under section 92,
(b) before the end of the period of six years starting with the day when the accused ceased to be unlawfully at large, the prosecutor applies to the court to proceed under section 92, and
(c) the court thinks it is appropriate for it to do so.
;
(b) section 105 has effect as if subsection (3) read—
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) before the end of the period of six years starting with the day when the accused ceased to be unlawfully at large, the prosecutor applies to the court to reconsider whether the accused has benefited from his general or particular criminal conduct (as the case may be), and
(b) the court thinks it is appropriate for it to do so.
;
(c) section 106 has effect as if subsection (1) read—
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the prosecutor believes that if the court were to find the amount of the accused's benefit in pursuance of this section it would exceed the relevant amount,
(c) before the end of the period of six years starting with the day when the accused ceased to be unlawfully at large, the prosecutor applies to the court to proceed under this section, and
(d) the court thinks it is appropriate for it to do so.
;
(d) the modifications set out in subsection (3)(a) to (d) of this section do not apply to proceedings that take place by virtue of section 104, 105 or 106 (as applied by this subsection).
(1) This section applies if—
(a) proceedings for an offence or offences are instituted against an accused but are not concluded,
(b) he is unlawfully at large, and
(c) the period of three months (starting with the day the court believes he first became unlawfully at large) has ended.
(2) If this section applies the court may, on an application by the prosecutor and if it believes it is appropriate for it to do so, proceed under section 92 in the same way as it must proceed if the conditions there mentioned are satisfied; but this is subject to subsection (3).
(3) If the court proceeds under section 92 as applied by this section, this Part has effect with these modifications—
(a) any person the court believes is likely to be affected by an order under section 92 is entitled to appear before the court and make representations;
(b) the court must not make an order under section 92 unless the prosecutor has taken reasonable steps to contact the accused;
(c) section 92(12) applies as if the reference to subsection (2) were to subsection (1) of this section;
(d) sections 96, 101(3), 102, 103, 104 and 105 do not apply;
(e) section 106 does not apply while the accused is still unlawfully at large.
(4) Once the accused has ceased to be unlawfully at large—
(a) section 106 has effect as if subsection (1) read—
(1) This section applies if—
(a) a court has made a confiscation order,
(b) the prosecutor believes that if the court were to find the amount of the accused's benefit in pursuance of this section it would exceed the relevant amount,
(c) before the end of the period of six years starting with the day when the accused ceased to be unlawfully at large, the prosecutor applies to the court to proceed under this section, and
(d) the court thinks it is appropriate for it to do so.
;
(b) the modifications set out in subsection (3)(a) to (d) of this section do not apply to proceedings that take place by virtue of section 106 (as applied by this subsection).
(5) If—
(a) the court makes an order under section 92 as applied by this section, and
(b) the accused is later convicted of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned,
section 92 does not apply so far as that conviction is concerned.
(1) This section applies if—
(a) the court makes a confiscation order under section 92 as applied by section 112,
(b) the accused ceases to be unlawfully at large,
(c) he is convicted of an offence (or any of the offences) mentioned in section 112(1)(a),
(d) he believes that the amount required to be paid was too large (taking the circumstances prevailing when the amount was found for the purposes of the order), and
(e) before the end of the relevant period he applies to the court to consider the evidence on which his belief is based.
(2) If (after considering the evidence) the court concludes that the accused’s belief is well founded—
(a) it must find the amount which should have been the amount required to be paid (taking the circumstances prevailing when the amount was found for the purposes of the order), and
(b) it may vary the order by substituting for the amount required to be paid such amount as it believes is just.
(3) The relevant period is the period of 28 days starting with—
(a) the date on which the accused was convicted of the offence mentioned in section 112(1)(a), or
(b) if there are two or more offences and the convictions were on different dates, the date of the latest.
(4) But in a case where section 112(1)(a) applies to more than one offence the court must not make an order under this section unless it is satisfied that there is no possibility of any further proceedings being taken or continued in relation to any such offence in respect of which the accused has not been convicted.
(1) Subsection (2) applies if—
(a) the court makes a confiscation order under section 92 as applied by section 112,
(b) the accused is later tried for the offence or offences concerned and acquitted of the offence or offences, and
(c) he applies to the court to discharge the order.
(2) In such a case the court must discharge the order.
(3) Subsection (4) applies if—
(a) the court makes a confiscation order under section 92 as applied by section 112,
(b) the accused ceases to be unlawfully at large,
(c) subsection (1)(b) does not apply, and
(d) he applies to the court to discharge the order.
(4) In such a case the court may discharge the order if it finds that—
(a) there has been undue delay in continuing the proceedings mentioned in section 112(1), or
(b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed with the prosecution.
(5) If the court discharges a confiscation order under this section it may make such a consequential or incidental order as it thinks is appropriate.
(1) Section 108 of the Procedure Act (Lord Advocate’s right of appeal in solemn proceedings) is amended as provided in subsections (2) to (4).
(2) In subsection (1), after paragraph (c) insert—
(ca) a decision under section 92 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 not to make a confiscation order;.
(3) In subsection (2)(b)(ii), for the words “or (c)” substitute “ , (c) or (ca) ”.
(4) After subsection (2) insert—
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b)(i) above in its application to a confiscation order by virtue of section 92(11) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the reference to the disposal being unduly lenient is a reference to the amount required to be paid by the order being unduly low.
(5) Section 175 of the Procedure Act (right of appeal in summary proceedings) is amended as provided in subsections (6) to (8).
(6) In subsection (4), after paragraph (c) insert—
(ca) a decision under section 92 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 not to make a confiscation order;.
(7) In subsection (4A)(b)(ii), for the words “or (c)” substitute “ , (c) or (ca) ”.
(8) After subsection (4A) insert—
(4B) For the purposes of subsection (4A)(b)(i) above in its application to a confiscation order by virtue of section 92(11) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the reference to the disposal being unduly lenient is a reference to the amount required to be paid by the order being unduly low.
(1) The amount ordered to be paid under a confiscation order must be paid on the making of the order; but this is subject to the following provisions of this section.
(2) If the accused shows that he needs time to pay the amount ordered to be paid, the court making the confiscation order may make an order allowing payment to be made in a specified period.
(3) The specified period—
(a) must start with the day on which the confiscation order is made, and
(b) must not exceed six months.
(4) If within the specified period the accused applies to the sheriff court for the period to be extended and the court, after giving the prosecutor an opportunity of being heard, believes there are exceptional circumstances, it may make an order extending the period.
(5) The extended period—
(a) must start with the day on which the confiscation order is made, and
(b) must not exceed 12 months.
(6) An order under subsection (4)—
(a) may be made after the end of the specified period, but
(b) must not be made after the end of the period of twelve months starting with the day on which the confiscation order is made.
(7) The court must not make an order under subsection (2) or (4) unless it gives the prosecutor an opportunity to make representations.
(1) If the amount required to be paid by a person under a confiscation order is not paid when it is required to be paid (whether when the order is made or within a period specified under section 116), he must pay interest on the amount for the period for which it remains unpaid.
(2) The rate of interest is the rate payable under a decree of the Court of Session.
(3) For the purposes of this section no amount is required to be paid under a confiscation order if—
(a) an application has been made under section 116(4),
(b) the application has not been determined by the court, and
(c) the period of 12 months starting with the day on which the confiscation order was made has not ended.
(4) In applying this Part the amount of the interest must be treated as part of the amount to be paid under the confiscation order.
118 Application of provisions about fine enforcement
(1) The provisions of the Procedure Act specified in subsection (2) apply, with the qualifications mentioned in that subsection, in relation to a confiscation order as if the amount ordered to be paid were a fine imposed on the accused by the court making the confiscation order.
(2) Those provisions are—
(a) section 211(3) to (6);
(b) section 214(4) to (6), but as if the references in subsection (4) to payment by instalments were omitted;
(c) section 216, but as if subsection (1)—
(i) gave the prosecutor an opportunity to be heard at any enquiry under that subsection; and
(ii) applied whether the offender was in prison or not;
(d) section 217;
(e) section 218(2) and (3);
(f) section 219, provided that—
(i) where a court imposes a period of imprisonment in respect of both a fine and a confiscation order the amounts in respect of which the period is imposed must, for the purposes of subsection (2), be aggregated;
(ii) before imposing a period of imprisonment by virtue of that section the court must require a report from any administrator appointed in relation to the confiscation order as to whether and how he is likely to exercise his powers and duties under this Part and must take that report into account; and the court may, pending such exercise, postpone any decision as to such imposition; and
(iii) where an administrator has not been appointed in relation to the confiscation order, or where the accused does not ask under section 116 for time for payment of any confiscation order imposed by the court, the prosecutor may apply to the court to postpone the imposition of any period of imprisonment for a period not exceeding 3 months to enable the prosecutor to apply to the court for the appointment of an administrator;
(g) section 220, but as if the reference in subsection (1) to payment of a sum by the person included a reference to payment of the sum in respect of the person by an administrator appointed in relation to the confiscation order;
(h) section 221 (other than subsection (3) and as if the words “Subject to subsection (3) below,” were omitted); but that section does not apply where an administrator is appointed in relation to the confiscation order;
(i) section 222, except that for the purposes of that section “confiscation order” in subsection (1) above must be construed as including such an order within the meaning of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (c. 37), the Criminal Justice (Confiscation) (Northern Ireland) Order 1990 (S.I. 1990/2588 (N.I. 17)), the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 (S.I. 1996/1299 (N.I. 9)) or of Part 2 or 4 of this Act;
(j) section 223;
(k) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2A) In its application in relation to confiscation orders, subsection (2) of section 219 of the Procedure Act is to be read as if for the Table in that subsection there were substituted the following Table—
Amount to be Paid under Compensation Order | Maximum Period of Imprisonment
£10,000 or less | 6 months
More than £10,000 but no more than £500,000 | 5 years
More than £500,000 but no more than £1 million | 7 years
More than £1 million | 14 years
(2B) The Scottish Ministers may by order—
(a) amend section 219(2) of the Procedure Act (as applied by this section) so as to provide for minimum periods of imprisonment in respect of amounts ordered to be paid under a confiscation order;
(b) amend the Table in subsection (2A) so as to remove, alter or replace any entry (including an entry inserted by virtue of paragraph (a) of this subsection) or to add any entry;
(c) apply (with or without modifications) any provision of the Procedure Act relating to enforcement of fines in consequence of exercising the power in paragraph (a) or (b) (including modifying any such provision in its application in relation to confiscation orders by virtue of this section).
(2C) In its application in relation to a confiscation order under Part 2 of this Act, subsection (8) of section 222 of the Procedure Act is to be read as if, in relation to a transfer of fine order under section 90 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, for “129 of the Sentencing Code” there were substituted “ 35(2A) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ”.
(2D) In its application in relation to a confiscation order under Part 4 of this Act, subsection (8) of section 222 of the Procedure Act is to be read as if—
(a) before the words “section 90” there were inserted “section 35 of the Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1945,”;
(b) in relation to a transfer of fine order under section 35 of that Act, for “129 of the Sentencing Code” there were substituted “ 185(2A) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ”.
(3) Where a court, by virtue of subsection (1), orders the amount ordered to be paid under a confiscation order to be recovered by civil diligence under section 221 of the Procedure Act, any arrestment executed by a prosecutor under subsection (3) of section 124 of this Act is to be treated as having been executed by the court as if that subsection authorised such execution.
(4) Subsection (5) applies where—
(a) a warrant for apprehension of the accused is issued for a default in payment of the amount ordered to be paid under a confiscation order in respect of an offence or offences, and
(b) at the time the warrant is issued the accused is liable to serve a period of imprisonment or detention (other than one of life imprisonment or detention for life) in respect of the offence (or any of the offences).
(5) In such a case any period of imprisonment or detention to which the accused is liable by virtue of section 219 of the Procedure Act runs from the expiry of the period of imprisonment or detention mentioned in subsection (4)(b).
(1) The court may exercise the powers conferred by section 120 if any of the following conditions is satisfied.
(2) The first condition is that—
(a) a criminal investigation has been instituted in Scotland with regard to an offence, and
(b) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the alleged offender has benefited from his criminal conduct.
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) proceedings for an offence have been instituted in Scotland and not concluded, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the accused has benefited from his criminal conduct.
(4) The third condition is that—
(a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 104, 105, 111 or 112 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the accused has benefited from his criminal conduct.
(5) The fourth condition is that—
(a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 106 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the accused’s benefit exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section).
(6) The fifth condition is that—
(a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 107 and not concluded, or the court believes that such an application is to be made, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the available amount exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section).
(7) The second condition is not satisfied if the court believes that—
(a) there has been undue delay in continuing the proceedings, or
(b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed.
(8) If an application mentioned in the third, fourth or fifth condition has been made the condition is not satisfied if the court believes that—
(a) there has been undue delay in continuing the application, or
(b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed.
(9) If the first condition is satisfied—
(a) references in this Part to the accused are to the alleged offender;
(b) references in this Part to the prosecutor are to the person the court believes is to have conduct of any proceedings for the offence;
(c) section 144(8) has effect as if proceedings for the offence had been instituted against the accused when the investigation was instituted.
(10) In this section, sections 120 to 140 and Schedule 3 “the court” means—
(a) the Court of Session, where a trial diet or a diet fixed for the purposes of section 76 of the Procedure Act in proceedings for the offence or offences concerned is to be, is being or has been held in the High Court of Justiciary;
(b) the sheriff exercising his civil jurisdiction, where a diet referred to in paragraph (a) is to be, is being or has been held in the sheriff court.
(1) If any condition set out in section 119 is satisfied the court may make an order (a restraint order) interdicting any specified person from dealing with any realisable property held by him.
(2) A restraint order may provide that it applies—
(a) to all realisable property held by the specified person whether or not the property is described in the order;
(b) to realisable property transferred to the specified person after the order is made.
(3) A restraint order may be made subject to exceptions, and an exception may in particular—
(a) make provision for reasonable living expenses and reasonable legal expenses;
(b) make provision for the purpose of enabling any person to carry on any trade, business, profession or occupation;
(c) be made subject to conditions.
(4) But an exception to a restraint order may not make provision for any legal expenses which—
(a) relate to an offence which falls within subsection (5), and
(b) are incurred by a person against whom proceedings for the offence have been instituted or by a recipient of a tainted gift.
(5) These offences fall within this subsection—
(a) the offence mentioned in section 119(2) or (3), if the first or second condition (as the case may be) is satisfied;
(b) the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, if the third, fourth or fifth condition is satisfied.
(6) The court may make such order as it believes is appropriate for the purpose of ensuring that the restraint order is effective.
(6A) Subsections (6B) and (6C) apply where the court makes a restraint order (by virtue of the first condition in section 119) as a result of a criminal investigation having been instituted in Scotland with regard to an offence.
(6B) The court—
(a) must include in the order a requirement for the applicant for the order to report to the court on the progress of the investigation at such times and in such manner as the order may specify (a “reporting requirement”), and
(b) must recall the order if proceedings for the offence are not instituted within a reasonable time (and this duty applies whether or not an application to recall the order is made under section 121(5)).
(6C) The duty under subsection (6B)(a) does not apply if the court decides that, in the circumstances of the case, a reporting requirement should not be imposed, but the court—
(a) must give reasons for its decision, and
(b) may at any time vary the order so as to include a reporting requirement (and this power applies whether or not an application to vary the order is made under section 121(5)).
(7) A restraint order does not affect property subject to a charge under—
(a) section 9 of the Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 (c. 32),
(b) Part 6 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (c. 33),
(c) Article 14 of the Criminal Justice (Confiscation) (Northern Ireland) Order 1990 (S.I. 1990/2588 (N.I. 17)),
(d) section 27 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (c. 37), or
(e) Article 32 of the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 (S.I. 1996/1299 (N.I. 9)).
(8) Dealing with property includes removing the property from Scotland.
120A Restraint orders: power to retain seized property etc.
(1) A restraint order may include provision authorising the detention of any property to which it applies if the property—
(a) is seized by an appropriate officer under a relevant seizure power, or
(b) is produced to an appropriate officer in compliance with a production order under section 380.
(2) Provision under subsection (1) may, in particular—
(a) relate to specified property, to property of a specified description or to all property to which the restraint order applies;
(b) relate to property that has already been seized or produced or to property that may be seized or produced in future.
(3) “Appropriate officer” means—
(a) a constable;
(b) an officer of Revenue and Customs;
(ba) an immigration officer;
(c) a National Crime Agency officer;
(4) “Relevant seizure power” means a power to seize property conferred by or by virtue of—
(a) section 127C or 387,
(b) a warrant granted under any other enactment or any rule of law, or
(c) any other enactment, or any rule of law, under which the authority of a warrant is not required.
(1) This section applies to a restraint order.
(2) An order may be made on an ex parte application by the prosecutor, which may be heard in chambers.
(3) The prosecutor must intimate an order to every person affected by it.
(4) Subsection (3) does not affect the time when the order becomes effective.
(5) The prosecutor and any other person affected by the order may apply to the court to recall an order or to vary it; and subsections (6) to (10) apply in such a case.
(6) If an application under subsection (5) in relation to an order has been made but not determined, realisable property to which the order applies must not be realised.
(7) The court may—
(a) recall the order;
(b) vary the order.
(8) In the case of a restraint order, if the condition in section 119 which was satisfied was that proceedings were instituted or an application was made, the court must recall the order on the conclusion of the proceedings or of the application (as the case may be).
(8A) The duty in subsection (8) to recall a restraint order on the conclusion of proceedings does not apply where—
(a) the proceedings are concluded by reason of—
(i) an accused's conviction for an offence being quashed under section 118(1)(c) of the Procedure Act, or
(ii) the setting aside of the verdict against the accused under section 183(1)(d) of the Procedure Act,
(b) the restraint order is in force at the time when the conviction is quashed or the verdict set aside (as the case may be), and
(c) the High Court of Justiciary has granted authority under section 118(1)(c) or 183(1)(d) of the Procedure Act to bring a new prosecution or the prosecutor has requested that the court grant such authority.
(8B) But the court must recall the restraint order—
(a) if the High Court of Justiciary refuses a request to grant authority under section 118(1)(c) or 183(1)(d) of the Procedure Act to bring a new prosecution,
(b) if the High Court of Justiciary has granted authority under section 118(1)(c) or 183(1)(d) of the Procedure Act to bring a new prosecution but no proceedings are commenced by the expiry of the time mentioned in section 119(5) or 185(5) of that Act (as the case may be), or
(c) otherwise, on the conclusion of the proceedings in the new prosecution of the accused under section 119 or 185 of the Procedure Act.
(9) In the case of a restraint order, if the condition in section 119 which was satisfied was that an investigation was instituted—
(a) the court must discharge the order if within a reasonable time proceedings for the offence are not instituted;
(b) otherwise, the court must recall the order on the conclusion of the proceedings.
(10) In the case of a restraint order, if the condition in section 119 which was satisfied was that an application was to be made—
(a) the court must discharge the order if within a reasonable time the application is not made;
(b) otherwise, the court must recall the order on the conclusion of the application.
(1) If on an application for a restraint order the court decides not to make one, the prosecutor may reclaim or appeal to the Court of Session against the decision.
(2) The prosecutor and any person affected by the order may reclaim or appeal to the Court of Session against the decision of the court on an application under section 121(5).
(1) This section applies where—
(a) a restraint order includes provision under section 120A authorising the detention of property, and
(b) the restraint order is recalled under section 121(7).
(2) This section also applies where—
(a) a restraint order includes provision under section 120A authorising the detention of property, and
(b) the restraint order is varied under section 121(7) so as to omit any such provision.
(3) The property may be detained until there is no further possibility of an appeal against (or review of)—
(a) the decision to recall or vary the restraint order, or
(b) any decision made on an appeal against (or review of) that decision.
(1) On the application of the prosecutor, the court may, in relation to the property mentioned in subsection (2), grant warrant for inhibition against any person specified in a restraint order.
(2) That property is the heritable realisable property to which the restraint order applies (whether generally or such of it as is specified in the application).
(3) The warrant for inhibition—
(a) has effect as if granted on the dependence of an action for debt by the prosecutor against the person and may be executed, recalled, loosed or restricted accordingly, and
(b) must forthwith be registered by the prosecutor in the Register of Inhibitions
(4) Section 155 of the Titles to Land Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1868 (c. 101) (effective date of inhibition) applies in relation to an inhibition for which warrant is granted under subsection (1) ....
(5) The execution of an inhibition under this section in respect of property does not prejudice the exercise of an administrator’s powers under or for the purposes of this Part in respect of that property.
(6) An inhibition executed under this section ceases to have effect when, or in so far as, the restraint order ceases to apply in respect of the property in relation to which the warrant for inhibition was granted.
(7) If an inhibition ceases to have effect to any extent by virtue of subsection (6) the prosecutor must—
(a) apply for the recall or, as the case may be, the restriction of the inhibition, and
(b) ensure that the recall or restriction is reflected in the Register of Inhibitions and Adjudications.
(1) On the application of the prosecutor the court may, in relation to moveable realisable property to which a restraint order applies (whether generally or such of it as is specified in the application), grant warrant for arrestment.
(2) Such a warrant for arrestment may be granted only if the property would be arrestable if the person entitled to it were a debtor.
(3) A warrant under subsection (1) has effect as if granted on the dependence of an action for debt at the instance of the prosecutor against the person and may be executed, recalled, loosed or restricted accordingly.
(4) The execution of an arrestment under this section in respect of property does not prejudice the exercise of an administrator’s powers under or for the purposes of this Part in respect of that property.
(5) An arrestment executed under this section ceases to have effect when, or in so far as, the restraint order ceases to apply in respect of the property in relation to which the warrant for arrestment was granted.
(6) If an arrestment ceases to have effect to any extent by virtue of subsection (5) the prosecutor must apply to the court for an order recalling, or as the case may be, restricting the arrestment.
(1) If the court makes a restraint order it may at any time, on the application of the prosecutor—
(a) appoint an administrator to take possession of any realisable property to which the order applies and (in accordance with the court’s directions) to manage or otherwise deal with the property;
(b) order a person who has possession of property in respect of which an administrator is appointed to give him possession of it.
(2) An appointment of an administrator may be made subject to conditions or exceptions.
(3) Where the court makes an order under subsection (1)(b), the clerk of court must notify the accused and any person subject to the order of the making of the order.
(4) Any dealing of the accused or any such person in relation to property to which the order applies is of no effect in a question with the administrator unless the accused or, as the case may be, that person had no knowledge of the administrator’s appointment.
(5) The court—
(a) may order a person holding an interest in realisable property to which the restraint order applies to make to the administrator such payment as the court specifies in respect of a beneficial interest held by the accused or the recipient of a tainted gift;
(b) may (on the payment being made) by order transfer, grant or extinguish any interest in the property.
(6) The court must not—
(a) confer the power mentioned in subsection (1) to manage or otherwise deal with the property, or
(b) exercise the power conferred on it by subsection (5),
unless it gives persons holding interests in the property a reasonable opportunity to make representations to it.
(7) The court may order that a power conferred by an order under this section is subject to such conditions and exceptions as it specifies.
(8) Managing or otherwise dealing with property includes—
(a) selling the property or any part of it or interest in it;
(b) carrying on or arranging for another person to carry on any trade or business the assets of which are or are part of the property;
(c) incurring capital expenditure in respect of the property.
(9) Subsections (1)(b) and (5) do not apply to property for the time being subject to a charge under—
(a) section (9) of the Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 (c. 32);
(b) section 78 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (c. 33);
(c) Article 14 of the Criminal Justice (Confiscation) (Northern Ireland) Order 1990 (S.I. 1990/2588 (N.I. 17));
(d) section 27 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (c. 37);
(e) Article 32 of the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 (S.I. 1996/1299 (N.I. 9)).
127 Restraint orders: restriction on proceedings and remedies
(1) While a restraint order has effect, the court may sist any action, execution or any legal process in respect of the property to which the order applies.
(2) If a court (whether the Court of Session or any other court) in which proceedings are pending in respect of any property is satisfied that a restraint order has been made or applied for or made in respect of the property, the court may either sist the proceedings or allow them to continue on any terms it thinks fit.
(3) Before exercising any power conferred by subsection (2), the court must give an opportunity to be heard to—
(a) the applicant for the restraint order;
(b) any administrator appointed under section 125.
(1) An appropriate officer may exercise the power conferred by section 127C if satisfied that any of the following conditions is met.
(2) The first condition is that—
(a) a criminal investigation has been started in Scotland with regard to an indictable offence,
(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) proceedings for the offence have not yet been started against the person in Scotland,
(d) there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the person has benefited from conduct constituting the offence, and
(e) a restraint order is not in force in respect of any realisable property.
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) a criminal investigation has been started in Scotland with regard to an indictable offence,
(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) proceedings for the offence have not yet been started against the person in Scotland, and
(d) a restraint order is in force in respect of any realisable property.
(4) The third condition is that—
(a) proceedings for an indictable offence have been started in Scotland and have not been concluded,
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the accused has benefited from conduct constituting the offence, and
(c) a restraint order is not in force in respect of any realisable property.
(5) The fourth condition is that—
(a) proceedings for an indictable offence have been started in Scotland and have not been concluded, and
(b) a restraint order is in force in respect of any realisable property.
(6) The fifth condition is that—
(a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 104, 105, 111 or 112 and not concluded, or the officer believes that such an application is to be made, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the accused has benefited from criminal conduct.
(7) The sixth condition is that—
(a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 106 and not concluded, or the officer believes that such an application is to be made, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the accused's benefit exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section).
(8) The seventh condition is that—
(a) an application by the prosecutor has been made under section 107 and not concluded, or the officer believes that such an application is to be made, and
(b) there is reasonable cause to believe that the court will decide under that section that the amount found under the new calculation of the available amount exceeds the relevant amount (as defined in that section).
(9) The third or fourth condition is not met if the officer believes that—
(a) there has been undue delay in continuing the proceedings, or
(b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed.
(10) If an application mentioned in the fifth, sixth or seventh condition has been made the condition is not met if the officer believes that—
(a) there has been undue delay in continuing the application, or
(b) the prosecutor does not intend to proceed.
(11) In relation to the first or second condition references in sections 127C to 127R to the accused are to the person mentioned in that condition.
(12) In relation to the first or second condition section 144(8) has effect as if proceedings for the offence had been started against the accused when the investigation was started.
(1) On being satisfied as mentioned in section 127B(1) an appropriate officer may seize any realisable property if the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that—
(a) the property may otherwise be made unavailable for satisfying any confiscation order that has been or may be made against the accused, or
(b) the value of the property may otherwise be diminished as a result of conduct by the accused or any other person.
(2) But the officer may not under subsection (1) seize—
(a) cash, or
(b) exempt property.
(3) “Cash” has the same meaning as in section 289.
(4) “Exempt property” means—
(a) such tools, books, vehicles and other items of equipment as are necessary to the accused for use personally in the accused's employment, business or vocation;
(b) such clothing, bedding, furniture, household equipment, provisions or other things as are necessary for satisfying the basic domestic needs of the accused and the accused's family.
(5) In relation to realisable property which is free property held by the recipient of a tainted gift, references in subsection (4) to the accused are to be read as references to the recipient of that gift.
Section 127B(11) is subject to this subsection.
(5A) On being satisfied as mentioned in section 127B(1) an appropriate officer may seize any free property if the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that it is a cryptoasset-related item.
(5B) A “cryptoasset-related item” is an item of property that is, or that contains or gives access to information that is, likely to assist in the seizure under subsection (1) of any cryptoasset.
(5C) The circumstances in which a cryptoasset is “seized” for the purposes of subsection (1) include circumstances in which it is transferred into a crypto wallet controlled by the appropriate officer.
(5D) If an appropriate officer is lawfully on any premises, the officer may, for the purpose of—
(a) determining whether any property is a cryptoasset-related item, or
(b) enabling or facilitating the seizure under subsection (1) of any cryptoasset,
require any information which is stored in any electronic form and accessible from the premises to be produced in a form in which it can be taken away and in which it is visible and legible, or from which it can readily be produced in a visible and legible form.
(5E) But subsection (5D) does not authorise an appropriate officer to require a person to produce any items subject to legal privilege (as defined in section 412).
(5F) Where an appropriate officer has seized a cryptoasset-related item under subsection (5A), they may use any information obtained from it for the purpose of—
(a) identifying or gaining access to a crypto wallet, and
(b) by doing so, enabling or facilitating the seizure under subsection (1) of any cryptoassets.
(6) The power conferred by this section—
(a) may be exercised only with the appropriate approval under section 127G unless, in the circumstances, it is not practicable to obtain that approval before exercising the power, and
(aa) where applicable, in accordance with subsection (6A) or (6B).
(6A) The power conferred by this section is exercisable by an officer of Revenue and Customs only if the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that conduct constituting the relevant offence relates to an assigned matter (within the meaning of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979).
(6B) The power conferred by this section is exercisable by an immigration officer only if the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that conduct constituting the relevant offence—
(a) relates to the entitlement of one or more persons who are not nationals of the United Kingdom to enter, transit across, or be in, the United Kingdom (including conduct which relates to conditions or other controls on any such entitlement), or
(b) is undertaken for the purposes of, or otherwise in relation to, a relevant nationality enactment.
(7) “Relevant offence” means—
(a) in a case where the officer is satisfied that the first, second, third or fourth condition in section 127B is met, the offence mentioned in that condition,
(b) in a case where the officer is satisfied that any of the other conditions in section 127B is met, the offence (or any of the offences) concerned.
(8) Relevant nationality enactment” means any enactment in—
(a) the British Nationality Act 1981,
(b) the Hong Kong Act 1985,
(c) the Hong Kong (War Wives and Widows) Act 1996,
(d) the British Nationality (Hong Kong) Act 1997,
(e) the British Overseas Territories Act 2002, or
(f) an instrument made under any of those Acts.
(1) If an appropriate officer is lawfully on any premises the officer may search the premises for the purpose of finding any property which—
(a) the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting may be found there, and
(b) if found there, the officer intends to seize under section 127C.
(2) The power conferred by this section may be exercised only with the appropriate approval under section 127G unless, in the circumstances, it is not practicable to obtain that approval before exercising the power.
(3) “Premises” has the meaning given by section 23 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.
(1) An appropriate officer may exercise the following powers if the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that a person is carrying property that may be seized under section 127C.
(2) The officer may, so far as the officer thinks it necessary or expedient for the purpose of seizing the property under that section, require the person—
(a) to permit a search of any article with the person,
(b) to permit a search of the person.
(3) An officer exercising a power under subsection (2) may detain the person for so long as is necessary for its exercise.
(4) A power conferred by this section may be exercised only with the appropriate approval under section 127G unless, in the circumstances, it is not practicable to obtain that approval before exercising the power.
(5) This section does not require a person to submit to an intimate search or strip search (within the meaning of section 164 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979).
(1) The powers specified in subsection (4) are exercisable if—
(a) an appropriate officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that a vehicle contains property that may be seized under section 127C, and
(b) it appears to the officer that the vehicle is under the control of a person who is in or in the vicinity of the vehicle.
(2) The powers are exercisable only if the vehicle is—
(a) in any place to which, at the time of the proposed exercise of the powers, the public or any section of the public has access, on payment or otherwise, as of right or by virtue of express or implied permission, or
(b) in any other place to which at that time people have ready access but which is not a dwelling.
(3) But if the vehicle is in a garden or yard or other land occupied with and used for the purposes of a dwelling, the officer may exercise the powers under subsection (4) only if the officer has reasonable grounds for believing—
(a) that the person does not reside in the dwelling, and
(b) that the vehicle is not in the place in question with the express or implied permission of another who resides in the dwelling.
(4) The officer may, so far as the officer thinks it necessary or expedient for the purpose of seizing the property under section 127C, require the person to—
(a) permit entry to the vehicle,
(b) permit a search of the vehicle.
(5) An officer exercising a power under subsection (4) may detain the vehicle for so long as is necessary for its exercise.
(6) A power conferred by this section may be exercised only with the appropriate approval under section 127G unless, in the circumstances, it is not practicable to obtain that approval before exercising the power.
(1) This section has effect for the purposes of sections 127C, 127D, 127E and 127F.
(2) The appropriate approval, in relation to the exercise of a power by an appropriate officer, means the approval of the sheriff or (if that is not practicable in any case) the approval of a senior officer.
(3) A senior officer means—
(a) in relation to the exercise of a power by an officer of Revenue and Customs, an officer of Revenue and Customs of a rank designated by the Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs as equivalent to that of a senior police officer,
(aa) in relation to the exercise of a power by an immigration officer, an immigration officer of a rank designated by the Secretary of State as equivalent to that of a senior police officer,
(ab) in relation to the exercise of a power by a National Crime Agency officer, the Director General of the National Crime Agency or any other National Crime Agency officer authorised by the Director General (whether generally or specifically) for this purpose,
(b) in relation to the exercise of a power by a constable, a senior police officer.
(4) A senior police officer means a police officer of at least the rank of inspector.
(1) An appropriate officer must give a written report to the appointed person in any case where—
(a) the officer seizes property under section 127C without the approval of the sheriff, and
(b) any of the property seized is not detained for more than 48 hours.
(2) An appropriate officer must also give a written report to the appointed person in any case where—
(a) the officer exercises any of the powers conferred by sections 127D, 127E and 127F without the approval of the sheriff, and
(b) no property is seized under section 127C.
(3) A report under this section must give particulars of the circumstances which led the officer to believe that—
(a) the powers were exercisable, and
(b) it was not practicable to obtain the approval of the sheriff.
(4) The appointed person means a person appointed for the purposes of this subsection by the Scottish Ministers.
(5) The appointed person must not be a person employed under or for the purposes of the Scottish Administration; and the terms and conditions of appointment, including any remuneration or expenses to be paid, are to be determined by the Scottish Ministers.
(6) The period of 48 hours mentioned in subsection (1)(b) is to be calculated in accordance with subsection (7).
(7) In calculating a period of 48 hours in accordance with this subsection, no account is to be taken of—
(a) any Saturday or Sunday,
(b) Christmas Day,
(c) Good Friday,
(d) any day that is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 in Scotland, or
(e) any day prescribed under section 8(2) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 as a court holiday in a sheriff court in the sheriff court district within which the power is exercised.
127I Report by appointed person on exercise of powers
(1) As soon as possible after the end of each financial year, the person appointed under section 127H(4) must prepare a report for that year.
(2) “Financial year” means—
(a) the period beginning with the day on which section 56 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009 comes into force and ending with the next 31 March (which is the first financial year), and
(b) each subsequent period of twelve months beginning with 1 April.
(3) The report must give the appointed person's opinion as to the circumstances and manner in which the powers conferred by sections 127C, 127D, 127E and 127F are being exercised in cases where the officer who exercised them is required to give a report under section 127H.
(4) The report may make any recommendations the appointed person considers appropriate.
(5) The appointed person must send a copy of the report to the Scottish Ministers.
(6) The Scottish Ministers must—
(a) publish any report received under subsection (5), and
(b) lay a copy before the Scottish Parliament.
(7) Before acting under subsection (6) the Scottish Ministers must exclude from the report any matter which the Scottish Ministers think is likely to prejudice any criminal investigation or criminal proceedings.
(8) If the Scottish Ministers exclude any matter from the report they must comply with subsection (6) in relation to the whole of the report as soon as they think that the excluded matter is no longer likely to prejudice any criminal investigation or criminal proceedings.